...
首页> 外文期刊>European food research and technology =: Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung. A >Comparison of different aroma-active compounds of Sichuan Dark brick tea (Camellia sinensis) and Sichuan Fuzhuan brick tea using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and aroma descriptive profile tests
【24h】

Comparison of different aroma-active compounds of Sichuan Dark brick tea (Camellia sinensis) and Sichuan Fuzhuan brick tea using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and aroma descriptive profile tests

机译:四川黑砖茶(山茶花)和四川富株砖采用气相色谱 - 质谱(GC-MS)和香气描述型材试验的不同香气活性化合物的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sichuan dark brick tea (Camellia sinensis) and Sichuan Fuzhuan brick tea have significantly different aroma characteristics although both of them have almost the same processing methods. Thus, these two types of tea were used as the research materials to determine the differences in their aroma compounds. The volatile compounds in the two types of tea were identified and quantified by headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), results showed that they both had 37 common volatile compounds. Then the aroma-active components were identified by odour activity value (OAV). It was found that SFBT had 20 aroma-active components, of which beta-ionone had the largest OAV (199547.72). SDBT has 21 aroma-active ingredients (including all 20 aroma-active components of SFBT), of which beta-ionone again has the largest OAV (114800.66). Finally, the aroma profile differences between the two tea samples were studied by aroma profile tests, and the results showed that the main aroma differences of SDBT and SFBT were caused by beta-ionone, epoxydihydrolinalool II, methyl salicylate, geranylacetone, nerolidol, benzaldehyde, benzyl acetate, nonanal, trans,trans-2,4-heptadienal and 1-octen-3-ol, in addition, defined SFBT's 'fungi flower aroma' and SDBT's 'aged fragrance' from the level of aroma monomer.
机译:四川黑砖茶(山茶花Sinensis)和四川茯福川砖茶具有显着不同的香气特性,尽管两者都有几乎相同的加工方法。因此,这两种类型的茶被用作研究材料以确定其香气化合物的差异。通过与气相色谱 - 质谱(HS-SPME-GC-MS)偶联的顶空固相微萃取鉴定和定量两种茶中的挥发性化合物,结果表明它们都具有37种常见的挥发性化合物。然后通过气味活性值(OAV)鉴定香气活性组分。发现SFBT有20个香气活性组分,其中β-离子有最大的OAV(199547.72)。 SDBT有21种香气活性成分(包括SFBT的所有20种芳香活性成分),其中β离子再次具有最大的OAV(114800.66)。最后,通过香气剖面试验研究了两种茶样品之间的香气谱差异,结果表明,SDBT和SFBT的主要香气差异是由β离子,环氧树脂,甲基丙酮,萘酚,苯甲醛,苯甲醛引起的。此外,乙酸苄酯,壬醇,反式,反式-2,4-庚二烯和1- octen-3-Ol,从香气单体的水平定义了SFBT的“真菌花卉香气”和SDBT的“老年香气”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号