首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners: evaluation and comparison of their immunisation practice for themselves, their patients and their children
【24h】

Vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners: evaluation and comparison of their immunisation practice for themselves, their patients and their children

机译:一般从业者之间的疫苗犹豫不决:对自己,患者及其子女的免疫实践的评估和比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To gain knowledge about vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners (GPs), we conducted a survey to compare their vaccination attitudes for themselves, their children and their patients. A questionnaire survey was sent to GPs working in private practice in the Rhne-Alpes region, France, between October 2013 and January 2014. GPs' immunisation practices for diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis (DTP), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), pneumococcal, pertussis, hepatitis B (hepB), human papillomavirus (HPV), seasonal and H1N1 influenza and meningococcal C (menC) vaccines were considered. Divergence was defined by the presence of at least one different immunisation practice between their patients and their children. A total of 693 GPs answered the questionnaire. When considering all investigated vaccines, 45.7 % of divergence was found. Individually, divergence was highest for the newest and more controversial, i.e. HPV (11.8 %), hepB (13.1 %), menC (23.7 %) and pneumococcal (19.8 %) vaccines. Only 73.9 % of GPs declared that they recommended HPV vaccine for their daughters. After multivariate analysis, older age was associated with higher risk of divergence. According to the French 2012 recommendations, GPs were insufficiently immunised, with 88 % for DTP and 72 % for pertussis. GPs declared to recommend vaccination against DTP, pertussis and MMR for their patients and their children in more than 95 % of cases. The declared rates of recommendation were lower than 90 % for other vaccines. These results bring new insight about vaccine hesitancy. GPs have divergent immunisation attitudes toward their relatives and their patients, especially when considering the newest and most controversial vaccines, with HPV vaccine being the main focus of controversies.
机译:为了在全科医生(GPS)之间获得有关疫苗犹豫不决的知识,我们进行了一项调查,以比较他们为自己,孩子和患者的疫苗接种态度。调查问卷调查被送往法国罗恩斯地区私人实践的GPS,2013年和2014年1月至2014年1月。GPS的白喉 - 破伤风 - 脊髓灰质炎(DTP),麻疹 - 腮腺炎 - 风疹(MMR)的免疫惯例,考虑了肺炎球菌,百日咳,乙型肝炎(HEPB),人乳头瘤病毒(HPV),季节性和H1N1流感和脑膜炎疫苗C(MENC)疫苗。通过在其患者及其子女之间存在至少一种不同免疫实践来定义分歧。共有693枚GPS回答问卷。在考虑所有研究的疫苗时,发现了45.7%的分歧。单独地,最新和更具争议性的分歧最高,即HPV(11.8%),HEPB(13.1%),MENC(23.7%)和肺炎球菌(19.8%)疫苗。只有73.9%的GPS宣布,他们推荐了女儿的HPV疫苗。多变量分析后,年龄较大的年龄与发散风险较高。根据法国2012年建议,GPS不充分免疫,DTP为88%,百日咳72%。 GPS宣布推荐针对DTP,Pertussis和MMR的疫苗接种患者及其儿童在95%以上的情况下。其他疫苗的建议汇率低于90%。这些结果带来了关于疫苗犹豫不决的新洞察力。 GPS对其亲属及其患者具有不同的免疫态度,特别是在考虑最新和最具争议的疫苗时,具有HPV疫苗是争议的主要重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号