首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Agronomy >Going beyond mean effect size: Presenting prediction intervals for on-farm network trial analyses
【24h】

Going beyond mean effect size: Presenting prediction intervals for on-farm network trial analyses

机译:超越平均效果大小:为农场网络试验分析提出预测间隔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of on-farm research is to identify and test a new technology, product or management practice (e.g. more efficient seeding rate, enhanced row spacing, better disease management treatment, etc.) suited to local conditions by comparing it to a standard farmer practice across several farmers' fields. Typically, each trial includes two treatments (new practice vs. standard control practice) replicated at least three times in each field. The statistical analysis of yield data collected in such trials provides growers with useful information about the effectiveness of the tested farming practice on crop productivity and its uncertainty. We used a random-effects model to i) estimate the performance of a treatment compared to a control in individual trials, ii) estimate the overall mean yield response across all trials, iii) compute prediction intervals describing a range of plausible yield response for a new (out-of-sample) field at the trial level, and iv) compute the probability that the tested management practice will be ineffective in a new field. We used frequentist (classical) and Bayesian approaches for data collected in 26 on-farm trial categories managed by the Iowa Soybean Association. Depending on the level of between-trial variability, we found that prediction intervals were 2.2-12.1 times larger than confidence intervals for the estimated mean yield responses for all tested management practices. We conclude that prediction intervals should be systematically reported to provide additional information about future trials or experiments with associated uncertainties. Nevertheless, prediction intervals should be interpreted with caution when the between-trial variance is small. Using prediction intervals and, when appropriate, the probability of ineffective treatment will prevent farmers from overoptimistic expectations that a significant effect at the overall population level will lead with high certainty to a yield gain on their own farms.
机译:对农场研究的目的是通过将其与标准农民进行比较,确定和测试新技术,产品或管理实践(例如更高效的播种率,增强的行间距,更好的疾病管理处理等)跨越几个农民的领域。通常,每次试验包括两个治疗(新实践与标准控制实践)在每个字段中至少复制三次。在此类试验中收集的产量数据的统计分析为种植者提供了有关经测试养殖实践对作物生产力及其不确定性的有效性的有用信息。我们使用了随机效果模型到i)估计与个别试验中的对照相比治疗的性能,II)估计所有试验中的总体平均产量响应,III)计算描述一个合理的产量响应范围的预测间隔试验水平的新(样本外)字段和IV)计算测试管理实践在新领域中无效的可能性。我们使用了IOWA大豆协会管理的26个农场试用类别收集的数据的频率(古典)和贝叶斯途径。根据试验变异性之间的水平,我们发现预测间隔比估计平均产量响应的置信区间大的2.2-12.1倍,对所有测试的管理实践进行了估计的平均产量响应。我们得出结论,应系统地报告预测间隔,以提供有关未来试验或具有相关不确定性的实验的其他信息。然而,当 - 试验方差小时,应谨慎地解释预测间隔。在适当的情况下,使用预测间隔,治疗无效的概率将阻止农民过多的预期,即整体人口水平的显着效果将在其自身农场的收益率上产生显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号