首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Resource windfalls and public debt: A political economy perspective
【24h】

Resource windfalls and public debt: A political economy perspective

机译:资源意外收获和公共债务:政治经济学视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Can natural resource windfalls increase public debt in democracies? Adopting a political economy perspective, we show that the answer is in the affirmative. Resource windfalls increase both the government's income and wealth. The former mitigates the need to borrow, whereas the latter encourages further borrowing (as it improves its terms), implying an ambiguous pure effect of resource windfalls on debt. Re-election considerations shorten political time horizons and give rise to political myopia. We show that higher political myopia, induced by more stringent (institutional) re-election restrictions, magnifies the wealth effect, turning positive the effect of resource windfalls on debt. We test the models predictions using a panel of U.S. states over the period 1963-2007. Our identification strategy rests on constitutionally-entrenched differences in gubernatorial term limits that provide plausibly exogenous variation in re-election prospects, and geographically-based cross-state differences in natural endowments. Our baseline estimates indicate that a resource windfall of $1 induces an increase of approximately phi 20 in the public debt of states with more stringent re-election restrictions. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自然资源意外收获可以增加民主国家的公共债务吗?采用政治经济学的观点,我们表明答案是肯定的。资源意外收获增加政府的收入和财富。前者减轻了借贷的需要,而后者鼓励进一步借款(因为它改善了其术语),这意味着资源意外收获对债务的含糊不清的纯粹影响。重新选举考虑缩短政治时间视野,产生政治近视。我们展示了更高的政治近视,由更严格(机构)重选限制引起的,放大财富效应,转动资源意外收获对债务的影响。我们在1963 - 2007年期间使用美国专家组测试模型预测。我们的识别策略依赖于宪义务术语限制的宪法根深蒂固的差异,为重选前景提供合理的外源性变化,以及自然禀赋的地理上的跨国差异。我们的基线估计表明,1美元的资源意外收获在公共债务中增加了大约PHI 20,具有更严格的重选限制。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号