首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Diagnosing the role of the state for local collective action: Types of action situations and policy instruments
【24h】

Diagnosing the role of the state for local collective action: Types of action situations and policy instruments

机译:诊断国家的作用以获取当地集体行动:行动情况和政策工具的类型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a diagnostic approach to the role and capacity of governments to facilitate local collective action and alleviate environmental problems. The paper adds to a nascent scholarship aiming to conciliate theories on "governance by government" and "governance by self-organization". We adopt two premises for that purpose: (1) policy instruments shall be tailored to the strategic nature of local resource management decisions; and (2) such nature is not static and can be modified via governmental policies. We first build on the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework to characterize the decision-making situations that local resource users face and the local rules that shape said situations. Then, based on common pool resource (CPR) and policy instrument choice theory, we identify four mechanisms through which different policy instruments can facilitate local collective action (change in payoffs and their perception, reduction of transaction costs, reduction of uncertainty, and normative consonance). This analytical approach is then applied to four illustrative cases of water management in Germany, France, Greece and Spain. As shown, local resource users are embedded in not one but many overlapping decision-making situations. In this context, the promotion of collective action is rarely accomplished via a single policy instrument or mechanism but via bundles of them. Also, the paper illustrates the importance of understanding how governmental policies modify the structure of rules and incentives that affect local resource users, potentially facilitating local collective action and the solution of environmental problems.
机译:本文提出了政府作用和能力促进当地集体行动和减轻环境问题的诊断方法。本文增加了一个新生的奖学金,旨在调解“政府治理”和“自我组织治理”的理论。我们采用了两个宗旨的两个场所:(1)政策文书应根据当地资源管理决策的战略性质量身定制; (2)这种性质并不静态,可以通过政府政策进行修改。我们首先建立在制度分析和发展(IAD)框架上,以表征本地资源用户面临的决策情况和塑造所述情况的本地规则。然后,基于共同的池资源(CPR)和策略仪器选择理论,我们确定了四种机制,不同的政策工具可以促进当地集体行动(减薪及其感知,减少交易成本,减少不确定性以及规范性和谐)。然后将这种分析方法应用于德国,法国,希腊和西班牙的四种分析案例。如图所示,本地资源用户嵌入不是一个但是许多重叠的决策情况。在这方面,通过单一的政策文书或机制来促进集体行动,而是通过它们的捆绑来实现。此外,本文说明了了解政府政策如何修改影响当地资源用户的规则和激励结构,可能促进当地集体行动和环境问题的解决方案的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号