...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Reviews >Experiences with integrative Indigenous and Western knowledge in water research and management: a systematic realist review of literature from Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States
【24h】

Experiences with integrative Indigenous and Western knowledge in water research and management: a systematic realist review of literature from Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States

机译:综合土着和西方知识在水研处和管理中的经验:从加拿大,澳大利亚,新西兰和美国的文学中的系统现实主义审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The implementation of Indigenous and Western knowledge systems in integrative water research and management is gaining prominence in the realm of academia, particularly in four countries with a shared, albeit different, history of British colonialism: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. While integrative water research in particular is gaining popularity, currently there is a gap in our understanding regarding where, when, why, how, and for whom this type of research has been successful. A systematic review method was used to identify peer-reviewed literature from each of the four countries and to understand where and when integrative water research projects were taking place. Then, we used a realist review method to synthesize and analyze the included peer-reviewed literature to determine why, how, and for whom this type of research has been successful, or not. Our systematic literature search provided 669 peer-reviewed articles from across the four countries, of which 97 met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Our findings indicate that the total number of integrative water research projects has been increasing since 2009, though these projects are largely concentrated within the realm of social science and conducted by non-Indigenous authors. Recognition of the value of Indigenous knowledge systems, coupled with an understanding that the use of Western knowledge systems alone has not remedied the disparity in access to safe water sources in Indigenous communities, has led researchers to recommend collaborative partnerships and governance structures as a potential pathway to effective integrative water research. Our research was conducted to enhance contemporary understanding of the strengths of implementing Indigenous and Western knowledge systems and to encourage readers to continue working towards a common goal of reconciliation and equality in all partnerships.
机译:在综合水研究和管理中实施土着和西方知识系统在学术界领域的突出,特别是在四个国家,虽然不同,但英国殖民主义的历史:加拿大,澳大利亚,新西兰和美国。虽然综合水研究特别是越来越受欢迎,但目前我们对何处,何时,为什么,如何以及对此类型的研究成功的何处,何时何地存在差距。系统审查方法用于从四个国家中的每一个识别同行评审文献,并了解正在发生的综合水研究项目。然后,我们使用了一个现实主义评论方法来综合和分析包括的同行评审文献,以确定这种类型的研究成功的原因,以及谁。我们的系统文献搜索提供了来自四个国家的669篇同行评审文章,其中97次达到了我们的纳入标准并进行了分析。我们的研究结果表明,自2009年以来,综合水研究项目总数一直在增加,尽管这些项目在很大程度上集中在社会科学领域,由非本土作者进行。认识到土着知识系统的价值,再加上识别出单独使用西方知识系统并未纠正在土着社区中获得安全水源的差异,导致研究人员推荐合作伙伴关系和治理结构作为潜在的途径有效的综合水研究。我们的研究是为了提高当代对实施土着和西方知识系统的优势,并鼓励读者继续努力在所有伙伴关系中努力实现和解和平等的共同目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号