...
首页> 外文期刊>In Practice >Comments on the dilemma in the December issue: Dealing with dogs that bite
【24h】

Comments on the dilemma in the December issue: Dealing with dogs that bite

机译:对12月份问题的困境评论:处理咬伤的狗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the dilemma discussed in the December issue of In Practice, Simon Coghlan described a scenario where you are working as a veterinarian in an animal shelter. The senior vet tells you about a dog that was surrendered to the shelter after it escaped from its yard and, without provocation, attacked a person, causing them a laceration that required stitches. A staff member at the shelter has offered to rehome the aggressive dog, as they live in the country and have a fenced yard. They believe the dog is owed a second chance. However, the senior vet disagrees saying: ‘Such dogs do not deserve to be in the community. They are a menace and should be destroyed’ (IP, December 2018, vol 40, pp 470-471). Is it morally right for you to kill the dog.
机译:在12月份在实践中讨论的困境中,Simon Coghlan描述了一种在动物庇护所担任兽医的情景。 高级兽医告诉你一只被宣传到屋檐后向庇护所投降的狗,而没有挑衅,袭击了一个人,导致他们撕裂所需的缝线。 庇护所的一名工作人员提供了重新装入侵略性的狗,因为他们住在该国,并拥有围栏院子。 他们相信狗欠第二次机会。 然而,高级兽医不同意说:'这些狗不值得在社区中。 他们是一个威胁,应该被摧毁'(IP,2018年12月,Vol 40,PP 470-471)。 是在道德上对你杀死狗是正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号