首页> 外文期刊>Economic geology and the bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists >Gold +/- Copper Endowment and Deposit Diversity in the Western Tethyan Magmatic Belt, Southeast Europe: Implications for Exploration
【24h】

Gold +/- Copper Endowment and Deposit Diversity in the Western Tethyan Magmatic Belt, Southeast Europe: Implications for Exploration

机译:黄金+/-铜禀赋和沉积物多样性在西部的Tethyan Magmatic带,东南欧:探索的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Major Au and Cu deposits in the Western Tethyan magmatic belt formed during two main periods of Cretaceous and Cenozoic magmatism. The Cretaceous deposits are dominantly Cu-Au porphyry, high-sulfidation epithermal, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits, whereas in the Cenozoic Cu is significant only in porphyry systems. However, the Cenozoic contains approximately three times greater total Au endowment (for Au deposits >0.5 million ounces), and also has a greater deposit diversity, including porphyry Au-Cu and Au-only deposits, high-, intermediate-, and low-sulfidation epithermal Au systems, and Au-rich carbonate replacement and sediment-hosted styles. The differences in endowment and deposit styles likely reflect regional-scale tectono-magmatic processes as well as local preservation and emplacement levels. The Cu +/- Au endowment of the Cretaceous is consistent with typical subduction-related arc environments and generation of talc-alkaline porphyry to high-sulfidation epithermal systems, whereas Au enrichment related to Cenozoic magmatism appears to be related to high-K calc-alkalic to shoshonitic compositions. In many of the Au-rich Cenozoic magmatic belts, there is geochemical evidence for sourcing subcontinental lithospheric mantle that was previously enriched by Cretaceous subduction-related metasomatism. Additional differences in Au endowment may reflect the preservation of shallow-level systems in the Cenozoic, particularly for the Au-rich Miocene porphyry deposits such as Kisladag and Bierly Vrch and the Apuseni porphyry Au-Cu deposits. However, in both the Cretaceous and Cenozoic, crustal exposure levels vary across the belt and cannot explain all the differences in Cu and Au endowment.
机译:在白垩纪和新生代岩浆广告的两个主要时期形成的Thethyan Magmatic带中的主要AU和Cu矿床。白垩纪沉积物是主要的Cu-Au斑岩,高硫化术和火山型硫化物沉积物,而在新生代Cu中仅在斑岩系统中显着。然而,新生代含有大约三倍的AU禀赋(适用于AU存款> 0.5万盎司),还有更大的存款多样性,包括斑岩Au-Cu和Au-o-Pockits,高,中级和低硫化术膜Au系统,富含富含碳酸盐的替代品和沉积物托管款式。禀赋和存款风格的差异可能反映了区域规模的构图 - 魔法过程以及局部保存和施加水平。白垩纪的Cu +/- au禀赋与典型的俯冲相关的弧环境和酸碱卟啉斑岩的产生一致,而与新生代岩浆有关的Au富集似乎与高k计算有关碱性的淋浴组合物。在许多丰富的新生代岩浆腰带中,有地球化学证据用于采购以前富集的白垩纪胶片相关的偏定型甲状腺型材。 AU禀赋的额外差异可能反映了新生代浅层系统的保存,特别是对于富含富含的甲基麦葡萄球菌和普通VRCH等富含富烯的卟啉沉积物和杏卟啉Au-Cu沉积物。然而,在白垩纪和新生代,地壳暴露水平随着皮带而异,无法解释Cu和Au禀赋的所有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号