首页> 外文期刊>Ecological informatics: an international journal on ecoinformatics and computational ecology >Bioclimatic variables from precipitation and temperature records vs. remote sensing-based bioclimatic variables: Which side can perform better in species distribution modeling?
【24h】

Bioclimatic variables from precipitation and temperature records vs. remote sensing-based bioclimatic variables: Which side can perform better in species distribution modeling?

机译:来自降水和温度记录的生物恐星变量与遥感基础的生物纤维素变量:哪一方在物种分布建模中可以更好地执行?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bioclimatic variables are considered as an indispensable data type in species distribution modeling. Such variables are available from the WorldClim database for the entire earth surface and at various spatial resolutions. Moreover, convenient access to real-time satellite data and their products has recently created a new way to produce environmental variables. Therefore, in the present study, it was attempted to compare the performance of bioclimatic variables derived from precipitation and temperature instrumental records (scenario I) and variables derived from remote sensing data (scenario II) where both scenarios were from 2001 to 2017. The variables were employed to predict the distribution of Artemisia sieberi in central Iran through five Species Distribution Models (SDMs) such as Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Random Forest (RF), Classification Tree Analysis (CTA), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), and Maximum Entropy (Maxent). The DEM layer was derived from 90-m Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), 1-km MODIS land surface temperature and vegetation indices products, and downscaled PERSIANN-CDR precipitation data were employed as derivations of temperature and precipitation to produce bioclimatic variables for scenario II. The results obtained from independent sample t-test on AUC(ratio) values derived from the correlative models showed that it had more satisfactory results when they were getting from the data of scenario II than the scenario I (p < .01). RF scored the highest partial AUC values (AUC(ratio)) among the single models, and based on both scenarios, ensemble map was able to provide the most accurate predictions. There were also non-significant differences among the performance of RF, CTA and ensemble models under two scenarios (p < .01). Results emphasized the importance of bioclimatic variables derived from remote sensing to produce more up-to-date information and also to improve the predictive performance of SDMs. Finally, it was suggested that convenient access to reliable and up-to-date information can assist modelers to outline management practices well.
机译:生物融色变量被认为是物种分布建模中的不可或缺的数据类型。这些变量可以从WorldClim数据库提供整个地球表面和各种空间分辨率。此外,方便地访问实时卫星数据及其产品最近创建了一种产生环境变量的新方法。因此,在本研究中,试图比较从遥感数据(场景II)导出的降水和温度仪器记录(场景I)和变量导出的生物融色变量的性能(方案II),其中两个方案是从2001年到2017年。变量被用来预测伊朗中部艾蒿的分布通过五种物种分布模型(SDMS),如广义线性模型(GLM),随机森林(RF),分类树分析(CTA),多变量自适应回归花键(MARS),和最大熵(maxent)。 DEM层源自90米的梭雷达地形任务(SRTM),1公里的MODIS陆地表面温度和植被指数产品,并且较低的PERSIANN-CDR降水数据被用作温度和降水的衍生,以产生场景的生物纤维素变量II。从相关模型导出的AUC(比率)值的独立样品T检验中获得的结果表明,当它们从场景II的数据中获取而不是方案I(P <.01)时,它具有更令人满意的结果。 RF在单个模型中获得最高的部分AUC值(AUC(比率)),并基于这两种情况,集合映射能够提供最准确的预测。在两个场景下的RF,CTA和集合模型的性能之间也存在非显着差异(P <.01)。结果强调了遥感源于遥感的生物融色变量的重要性,以产生更多最新信息,并还提高SDMS的预测性能。最后,有人建议,方便地访问可靠和最新信息,可以帮助建模者概述管理实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号