...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecography >On the use of climate covariates in aquatic species distribution models: are we at risk of throwing out the baby with the bath water?
【24h】

On the use of climate covariates in aquatic species distribution models: are we at risk of throwing out the baby with the bath water?

机译:关于水生物种配送模型中气候协变者的使用:我们是否有风险扔掉婴儿的水壶?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Species distribution models (SDMs) in river ecosystems can incorporate climate information by using air temperature and precipitation as surrogate measures of instream conditions or by using independent models of water temperature and hydrology to link climate to instream habitat. The latter approach is preferable but constrained by the logistical burden of developing water temperature and hydrology models. We therefore assessed whether regional scale, freshwater SDM predictions are fundamentally different when climate data versus instream temperature and hydrology are used as covariates. Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) SDMs were built for 15 freshwater fishes using one of two covariate sets: 1) air temperature and precipitation (climate variables) in combination with physical habitat variables; or 2) water temperature, hydrology (instream variables) and physical habitat. Three procedures were then used to compare results from climate vs instream models. First, equivalence tests assessed average pairwise differences (site-specific comparisons throughout each species' range) among climate and instream models. Second, congruence' tests determined how often the same stream segments were assigned high habitat suitability by climate and instream models. Third, Schoener's D and Warren's I niche overlap statistics quantified range-wide similarity in predicted habitat suitability from climate vs instream models. Equivalence tests revealed small, pairwise differences in habitat suitability between climate and instream models (mean pairwise differences in MaxEnt raw scores for all species 3 x 10(-4)). Congruence tests showed a strong tendency for climate and instream models to predict high habitat suitability at the same stream segments (median congruence = 68%). D and I statistics reflected a high margin of overlap among climate and instream models (median D = 0.78, median I = 0.96). Overall, we found little support for the hypothesis that SDM predictions are fundamentally dif
机译:河流生态系统中的物种分配模型(SDMS)可以通过使用空气温度和降水作为仪器条件的替代措施或使用独立的水温和水文模型来将气候信息纳入气候信息,以将气候与仪器栖息地联系起来。后一种方法是优选的,但受到水温和水文模型的后勤负担约束。因此,我们评估了区域规模是否,当气候数据与仪器温度和水文用作协变者时,淡水SDM预测从根本上不同。使用两个协变量组中的一个,空气温度和降水(气候变量)结合物理栖息地,最大熵(最大)SDMS为15个淡水鱼类而建造了15个淡水鱼;或2)水温,水文(仪器变量)和物理栖息地。然后使用三个程序来比较气候VS仪器模型的结果。首先,在气候和仪器模型中,等效测试评估了平均成对差异(在每个物种中的站点特定比较)。其次,同一年的测试确定了通过气候和仪器模型分配了相同的流段的高栖息地适用性的频率。第三,Schoener的D和Warren的I Niche重叠统计量化范围范围内的预测栖息地适用于气候VS Instrod模型。等效测试显示了气候和仪器模型之间的栖息地适用性的小,成对差异(平均成对差异为所有物种的最大原料分数<3×10(-4))。一致性测试表明,气候和仪器模型的强烈趋势,以预测相同的流段(中位数= 68%)预测高栖息地适用性。 D和I统计数据反映了气候和仪器模型之间的高幅度(中位数D = 0.78,中位I = 0.96)。总的来说,我们发现对假设的支持很少,即SDM预测从根本上差异

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecography》 |2018年第4期|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Ctr Environm Studies Richmond VA 23284 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生态学(生物生态学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号