...
首页> 外文期刊>Acute pain: international journal of acute pain management >Sufentanil does not enhance the efficacy of ropivacaine in combined lumbar plexus and sciatic block: A controlled, randomised clinical trial
【24h】

Sufentanil does not enhance the efficacy of ropivacaine in combined lumbar plexus and sciatic block: A controlled, randomised clinical trial

机译:舒芬太尼不能增强罗哌卡因在腰丛和坐骨神经痛联合治疗中的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary To date, data on the efficacy of the combination of opioids and local anesthetics in peripheral nerve block are not conclusive yet. In this study, the onset time, duration as well as quality of lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blockade were evaluated using sufentanil and ropivacaine combination compared with plain ropivacaine. Forty patients scheduled for lower extremity surgery under combined lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block were randomly allocated into two groups. Fifty millil-itres of 0.375% ropivacaine with 0.5 mug/ml sufentanil (trial group) and 0.375% plain ropivacaine (control group) were administered when the location of lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve were confirmed by a nerve stimulator. Onset and duration of sensory and motor block were investigated. Opioid-related side effects were recorded. Quality of anesthesia in terms of success rate of block and patients' satisfaction were reviewed after surgery. The addition of sufentanil to ropivacaine did not facilitate the onset of the block, nor the duration of analgesia. For lumbar plexus block, the mean onset time of sensory block was 13.9+-7.4 min (trial group) versus 12.4+-z5.9min (control group), respectively, 11.3+-6.5 minversus10.5+-4.2min, respectively, for motor block. For sciatic nerve block, the onset time of sensory block was 14.6 +- 8.6 min versus 14.2 +- 7.0 min, respectively, 15.4+-.3 min versus 13.6+-9.5 min, respectively, for motor block. The mean duration of sensory block is 14.3+-4.5h (trial group) versus 15.2+-4.6h (control group), respectively; the mean duration of motor block 17.3 +-6.1 h versus 16.7+-5.3 h, respectively. Opioid-related side effects were similar between groups, as well as the success rate of the block and patients' satisfaction. We concluded that, during combined lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block, adding sufentanil 0.5 mug/ml to 0.375% ropivacaine solution did not provide clinically relevant advantages in terms of onset time, duration and quality of anesthesia for patients undergoing elective lower extremity surgery.
机译:总结迄今为止,关于阿片类药物和局麻药在周围神经阻滞中的疗效尚无定论。在这项研究中,使用舒芬太尼和罗哌卡因联合与普通罗哌卡因相比,评估了发作时间,持续时间以及腰丛神经和坐骨神经阻滞的质量。预定将腰神经丛和坐骨神经阻滞合并下肢手术的40例患者随机分为两组。当通过神经刺激器确认腰丛和坐骨神经位置时,给予50毫升的0.375%罗哌卡因与0.5杯/毫升舒芬太尼(试验组)和0.375%平原罗哌卡因(对照组)。感觉和运动阻滞的发作和持续时间进行了调查。记录了阿片类药物相关的副作用。术后回顾麻醉质量,包括阻滞成功率和患者满意度。罗哌卡因中加用舒芬太尼不利于阻滞的发作,也不利于镇痛的持续时间。对于腰丛神经阻滞,感觉阻滞的平均发作时间分别为13.9 + -7.4分钟(试验组)和12.4 + -z5.9min(对照组),分别为11.3 + -6.5分钟和10.5 + -4.2分钟。用于电机块。对于坐骨神经阻滞,感觉阻滞的发作时间分别为14.6±8.6分钟和14.2±7.0分钟,运动阻滞的发生时间分别为15.4±0.3分钟和13.6±9.5分钟。感觉障碍的平均持续时间分别为14.3 + -4.5h(试验组)和15.2 + -4.6h(对照组)。电机阻滞的平均持续时间分别为17.3 + -6.1小时和16.7 + -5.3小时。各组间阿片类药物相关的副作用,阻滞成功率和患者满意度相似。我们得出的结论是,在腰丛神经和坐骨神经阻滞合并过程中,将舒芬太尼0.5杯/毫升添加至0.375%罗哌卡因溶液中,对于接受选择性下肢手术的患者,在开始时间,持续时间和麻醉质量方面均无临床相关优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号