...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).
【24h】

A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).

机译:一项随机安慰剂对照的多中心研究,评估非那雄胺在男性慢性盆腔痛综合征(IIIA类慢性非细菌性前列腺炎)中的安全性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CPPS) compared with placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men (76) with category IIIA CPPS enrolled in four North American prostatitis research centres were randomized after a 2-week placebo run-in to finasteride or placebo for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was a subjective overall assessment (SOA); the secondary efficacy variables included the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and safety data. Patients were assessed at screening, baseline (after the 2-week placebo run-in), 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Sixty-four patients had at least one assessment on medication (31 placebo, 33 finasteride); 75% of the finasteride and 54% of the placebo group had at least a mild improvement (defined as > 25% improvement in SOA), and 44% and 27%, respectively, a moderate or marked improvement (>50% improvement in SOA). The trend was similar in the NIH-CPSI scores. Five patients in the finasteride and seven in the placebo group reported medication-related adverse events. CONCLUSION This randomized placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that finasteride was of benefit for some men with category IIIA CPPS, but the results do not justify recommending finasteride as monotherapy, except for men who also have benign prostatic hyperplasia. A larger, properly powered study, possibly evaluating combination with other therapies or specifically in men with prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia, is required to confirm any clinical benefit.
机译:目的与非安慰剂相比,确定非那雄胺是否可以减轻患有慢性非细菌性前列腺炎(美国国立卫生研究院,IIIA类慢性盆腔疼痛综合征,CPPS)临床诊断的男性症状。患者和方法在四个北美前列腺炎研究中心就诊的IIIA类CPPS男性(76)在经过2周的安慰剂磨合后,被随机分配至非那雄胺或安慰剂6个月。主要功效变量是主观总体评估(SOA);次要疗效变量包括NIH慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)和安全性数据。在筛查,基线(2周安慰剂磨合后),3个月和6个月时评估患者。结果64例患者至少接受了一次药物评估(安慰剂31例,非那雄胺33例)。非那雄胺的75%和安慰剂组的54%至少有轻度改善(定义为SOA改善> 25%),分别有44%和27%的中度或显着改善(SOA改善> 50%) )。 NIH-CPSI分数的趋势相似。非那雄胺中有5名患者,安慰剂组中有7名患者报告了与药物相关的不良事件。结论这项随机安慰剂对照的先导研究表明,非那雄胺对某些IIIA类CPPS男性有益,但结果并不能证明非那雄胺作为单药治疗的合理性,但前列腺肥大的男性除外。需要进行较大规模,有足够根据的研究,可能评估与其他疗法的组合,或者专门针对患有前列腺炎和前列腺增生的男性进行评估,以确认其临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号