首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Rotating Machinery >Comparison of Frequency Domain and Time-Domain Methods for Aeromechanical Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Frequency Domain and Time-Domain Methods for Aeromechanical Analysis

机译:气球理分析频域和时域方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unsteady flow around an oscillating plate cascade and that through a single compressor rotor subject to vibration have been computationally studied, aimed at examining the predictive ability of two low fidelity frequency methods compared with a high fidelity time-domain solution method for aeroelasticity. The computational solutions demonstrate the capabilities of the frequency domain methods compared with the nonlinear time-domain solution method in capturing small perturbations in the unsteady flow. They also show the great advantage of significant CPU time saving by the frequency methods over the nonlinear time method. Comparisons of two different frequency methods, nonlinear harmonic and phase solution method, show that these methods can produce different results due to the differences in numeric and physical conditioning. The results obtained using phase solutions method are in better agreement with the nonlinear time-domain solution. This is because the same numeric and physical conditioning are used in both the nonlinear time-domain method and phase solution frequency domain method.
机译:围绕振荡板级联的不稳定流动,通过单个压缩机转子经过振动进行了计算研究,旨在检查两种低保真频率方法的预测能力,与空气弹性的高保真时域解决方法相比。计算解决方案展示了与非线性时域解法相比捕获不稳定流中的小扰动的非线性时域解决方法的能力。它们还展现了在非线性时间方法上通过频率方法显着的CPU时间节省的优势。两种不同频率方法,非线性谐波和相位解决方法方法的比较表明,由于数字和物理调节的差异,这些方法可以产生不同的结果。使用相溶液方法获得的结果与非线性时域解决方案更好。这是因为非线性时域方法和相位解决方案频域方法都使用了相同的数字和物理调节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号