首页> 外文期刊>International journal of palliative nursing >Clinical prediction survival of advanced cancer patients by palliative care: a multi-site study
【24h】

Clinical prediction survival of advanced cancer patients by palliative care: a multi-site study

机译:姑息治疗晚期癌症患者的临床预测存活:多网站研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: This study examined (I) accuracy of clinician prediction of survival (CPS) by palliative practitioners on first assessment with the use of standardised palliative tools, (2) factors affecting accuracy, (3) potential impact on clinical care. Methods: A multi-site prospective study (n= 1530) was used. CPS was divided into four time periods (<=2wks, >2 to 6wks, >6 to 12wks and >12wks). Multivariate analysis was assessed on six predictor variables. Results: Overall, median survival of the sample was only 5 weeks. CPS category was accurate only 38.6% of the time, with 44.6% patients dying before the predicted time period. Of six candidate variables, on multivariate analysis only (i) the clinical time periods themselves and (ii) Palliative Performance Scale <=50 predicted for prognostic accuracy. Conclusion: CPS, even by palliative practitioners, remains overly optimistic with the existence of the horizon effect. This raises the question in that these individuals may have been potentially overtreated.
机译:目的:本研究审查了(i)通过使用标准化的姑息工具,(2)影响精度的因素,(3)对临床护理的潜在影响,通过使用标准化的姑息工具(2)潜在影响对临床护理的潜在影响,研究(i)临床医生预测的临床医生(CPS)的准确性。方法:使用多站点前瞻性研究(n = 1530)。 CPS分为四个时间段(<= 2wks,> 2至6wks,> 6至12wks和> 12wks)。在六个预测变量中评估多变量分析。结果:总体而言,样品的中位数存活仅为5周。 CPS类别仅准确38.6%的时间,44.6%的患者在预测的时间段之前死亡。在六个候选变量中,仅在多变量分析(i)临床时间段本身和(ii)池灰性能尺度<= 50预测预后准确性。结论:即使通过姑息治疗者,CPS甚至仍然仍然乐观地存在于地平线效应。这提出了这些人可能会受到潜在过度的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号