首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >A new automated system for urine analysis: a simple, cost-effective and reliable method for distinguishing between glomerular and nonglomerular sources of haematuria.
【24h】

A new automated system for urine analysis: a simple, cost-effective and reliable method for distinguishing between glomerular and nonglomerular sources of haematuria.

机译:一种用于尿液分析的新型自动化系统:一种用于区分血尿的肾小球和非肾小球来源的简单,经济高效且可靠的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability, reliability and accuracy of a new automated system of urine analysis in differentiating glomerular from nonglomerular bleeding in the initial investigation of haematuria, and compare its efficacy with conventional phase-contrast microscopy (PCM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and six urine samples from patients in whom the final diagnosis was available were analysed using electrical flow impedance to detect, enumerate and size red blood cells in a conductive fluid (the cellfacts analyser, Microbial Systems Ltd, Coventry, UK). All the samples were also tested using a dipstick method and PCM was carried out for comparison on 45 of the 106 urine specimens. The results of cellfacts analysis were correlated with the final diagnoses to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of this method; the costs were also analysed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine urine samples tested positive for blood on dipstick urine analysis and all these were confirmed to have red blood cells on cellfacts analysis. The remaining 37 samples were negative for blood on dipstick testing and cellfacts analysis, although seven patients had been referred with previously detected microscopic haematuria, none of whom were found to have any detectable pathology in the urinary tract on clinical examination and investigations. The remaining 30 patients were diagnosed to have urological or nephrological conditions with no haematuria. In the positive group, 20 (29%) patients were from the glomerular group, with a mean (range) red blood cell size of 4.25 (4-5.1) micrometer, and 49 (71%) from the nonglomerular group, with red blood cells of 5.47 (4.67-5.70) micrometer. These ranges overlapped at 4.67-5.1 micrometer at the decision threshold of 4.75 micrometer, the distribution of dysmorphic and eumorphic red blood cells for the glomerular group was 18 (90%) and two (10%), respectively, and for the nonglomerular group was 2 (4%) and 47 (96%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 90%, 96%, 90% and 96%, respectively. Consumable and labour costs were very low. CONCLUSIONS: Cellfacts analysis is a simple, rapid, objective and cost-effective method for differentiating glomerular from nonglomerular urinary red blood cells, especially when few such cells are present.
机译:目的:在血尿的初步研究中确定一种新型的尿液分析自动系统在区分肾小球出血和非肾小球出血方面的能力,可靠性和准确性,并将其与常规相差显微镜(PCM)进行比较。患者和方法:使用电流阻抗分析了可进行最终诊断的患者的一百零六份尿液样本,以检测,枚举导电液体中的红细胞并对其进行尺寸测定(细胞因子分析仪,微生物系统有限公司,英国考文垂, )。还使用量油尺方法测试了所有样品,并对106个尿液样本中的45个进行了PCM进行比较。细胞因子分析的结果与最终诊断相关,以评估该方法的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。成本也进行了分析。结果:在试纸尿液分析中,有69份尿液样本检测为阳性,在细胞事实分析中,所有这些样本均被确认具有红细胞。其余的37个样品在量油尺测试和细胞事实分析中血液均为阴性,尽管有7名患者曾被转诊至先前发现的镜下血尿,但在临床检查和研究中均未发现尿路有任何可检测的病理。其余30名患者被诊断患有泌尿科或肾脏科疾病,没有血尿。在阳性组中,肾小球组有20(29%)名患者,平均红细胞大小为4.25(4-5.1)微米,非肾小球组有49名(71%),有红血球。单元为5.47(4.67-5.70)微米。这些范围在4.75-5.1微米处重叠,决策阈值为4.75微米,肾小球组的畸形和正常红细胞的分布分别为18(90%)和两个(10%),非肾小球组为2(4%)和47(96%)。敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为90%,96%,90%和96%。耗材和人工成本非常低。结论细胞因子分析是一种区分肾小球和非肾小球性尿红细胞的简单,快速,客观且具有成本效益的方法,尤其是在这种细胞很少的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号