首页> 外文期刊>Insectes Sociaux: Bulletin de l'Union Internationale pour l'Etude des Insectes Sociaux >When and how obstacle size and the number of foragers affect clearing a foraging trail in leaf-cutting ants
【24h】

When and how obstacle size and the number of foragers affect clearing a foraging trail in leaf-cutting ants

机译:何时以及障碍物尺寸和觅食者的数量会影响叶子切割蚂蚁中的觅食路径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Taking bad decisions to solve problems can negatively affect organism fitness, hence, the costs accrued by them should modulate decisions about when and how problems should be solved. We studied the problem of trail maintenance in leaf-cutting ants. We evaluated whether colonies have individuals exclusively dedicated to trail maintenance, and how obstacle size and ant forager flux influence the decision of removing obstacles, and the number of trail-clearing ants. We placed obstacles of different sizes, in low and high ant fluxes in different trails of Atta sexdens, and measured ant flux without and with obstacles, if ants removed obstacles, the number of trail-clearing ants and removal time. Obstacle cost was estimated as the proportion of ants that were blocked by the obstacle. We found that colonies lack exclusive trail-clearing ants, i.e., clearing ants also foraged and vice versa. The obstacle cost increased with obstacle size and ant flux. Removal probability increased with this cost. The number of trail-clearing ants increased with obstacle size but did not vary with ant flux, suggesting that the number of trail-clearing ants depends on intrinsic problem characteristics (i.e., higher resistance to traction in bigger obstacles), but does not depend on social context (i.e., interference with foragers). Regardless of the obstacle size, the removal time increased with the number of trail-clearing ants suggesting that interference among individuals is higher in larger working groups than in smaller ones. Our results suggest that individual capabilities as well as the coordination level among individuals influence the solving of a problem and the number of individuals involved in it. We discuss possible mechanisms behind results and propose a conceptual model about the costs and benefits of the removal task.
机译:采取不良决定解决问题可能会对生物健身产生负面影响,因此,他们应归因的成本应该调制关于何时以及如何解决问题的决定。我们研究了叶片蚂蚁的痕迹维护问题。我们评估了殖民地是否有专门致力于追踪维护的个人,以及障碍物尺寸和蚂蚁福克斯如何影响去除障碍物的决定以及停留清除蚂蚁的数量。我们将不同尺寸的障碍放置在不同迹象的不同迹线的低和高蚂蚁通量,并测量蚂蚁助焊剂没有和障碍物,如果蚂蚁去除障碍,则停止射击蚂蚁的数量和去除时间。障碍成本估计是障碍物被阻挡的蚂蚁的比例。我们发现殖民地缺乏独家排行清除蚂蚁,即清除蚂蚁也觅食,反之亦然。障碍物成本随着障碍物尺寸和蚂蚁通量而增加。去除概率随这种成本而增加。停止清除蚂蚁的数量随着障碍物尺寸而增加,但与蚂蚁磁通量没有变化,表明路径清除蚂蚁的数量取决于内在问题特征(即,更高的障碍物牵引力),但不依赖于社会背景(即对觅食者的干扰)。无论障碍物尺寸如何,去除时间都随着跟踪清除蚂蚁的数量而增加,表明个体之间的干扰在较大的工作组中比较小的工作组更高。我们的结果表明,个人能力以及个人之间的协调水平会影响解决问题的问题和个人数量。我们讨论结果背后的可能机制,并提出了一个关于删除任务的成本和益处的概念模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号