...
首页> 外文期刊>Audiology & neuro-otology >Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear
【24h】

Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear

机译:单面聋耳蜗植入物用户在非植入耳朵中的无限制或限制声学听力的双面聋耳蜗植入物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cochlear implantation (CI) can benefit patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) in terms of sound localization, speech understanding in noise, tinnitus severity, and quality of life (QoL). In previous studies, CI outcomes have been largely reported for SSD patients with normal unrestricted hearing in the contralateral ear. However, SSD patients may often have some degree of hearing loss in the contralateral ear (restricted acoustic hearing). In this study, we report results from a French clinical trial for CI in in SSD patients (NCT02204618). Localization, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in noise, tinnitus severity, and QoL were evaluated in 18 SSD patients 1 year after CI. Data were analyzed for 2 subject groups according to the pure-tone average thresholds in the non-implanted ear: unrestricted acoustic hearing (UNRES; 25 dB HL; n = 10) and restricted acoustic hearing (RES; 25 dB HL; n = 8). Across all subjects, localization was significantly better with the CI on than off (p = 0.005); there was no significant difference between subject groups (p = 0.301). When speech and noise were co-located (S0N0), there was no significant difference in SRTs with the CI on or off (p = 0.480); SRTs were significantly better for the UNRES than for the RES group (p = 0.005). When speech and noise were spatially separated (SCINNH), SRTs were significantly better with the CI on than off (p 0.001). While SRTs were better for the UNRES than for the RES group (p = 0.024), the CI benefit was more than 50% greater for the RES group due to the restoration of high-frequency speech cues. Questionnaire data showed that tinnitus severity was significantly reduced (p = 0.045) and QoL was significantly improved after one year of experience with the CI (p 0.001). Age at testing was significantly correlated with SRTs for the S0N0 condition; duration of deafness was correlated with SRTs for the SCINNH condition. There were relatively few correlations between behavioral and subjective measures, suggesting that both were valuable when assessing CI benefits for SSD patients. The present data suggest that indications for CI should be expanded to include unilaterally deaf patients who have normal hearing or mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the non-implanted ear. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:耳蜗植入(CI)可以在声音本地化方面受益于单面耳聋(SSD)的患者,噪音,耳鸣严重程度和生活质量(QOL)。在以前的研究中,CI结果在很大程度上据报道,SSD患者在对侧耳朵正常无限制的患者。然而,SSD患者通常可能在对侧耳中有一定程度的听力损失(受限制的声学听力)。在这项研究中,我们在SSD患者中的CI临床试验(NCT02204618)中报告了法国临床试验结果。在CI之后1年在18个SSD患者中评估了噪声,耳鸣严重程度和QoL中的定位,语音接收阈值(SRT)。根据非植入耳中的纯净平均阈值分析2个受试者的数据:不受限制的声学听力(Unsers; 25 dB HL; n = 10)和限制的声学听力(RES;& 25 dB HL; n = 8)。在所有受试者中,CI的定位明显更好(P = 0.005);对象组之间没有显着差异(p = 0.301)。当语音和噪声共同定位时(S0N0),CI ON或OFF的SRTS没有显着差异(P = 0.480);对UNRES比RES组的SRTs显着更好(P = 0.005)。当言语和噪声在空间分离(ScinnH)时,CI的SRT显着更好,而不是OFF(P <0.001)。虽然SRT对UNS的更好而不是RES组(P = 0.024),但由于恢复高频语音提示,CI益处大于50%以上。调查问卷数据显示,在与CI的经验一年后,耳鸣严重程度显着降低(P = 0.045),QOL显着改善(P <0.001)。在测试时的年龄与S0N0条件的SRT显着相关;耳聋的持续时间与scinnh条件的Srts相关。行为和主观措施之间存在相对较少的相关性,暗示在评估SSD患者的CI益处时都是有价值的。目前的数据表明,CI的适应症应扩大,包括在非植入耳中具有正常听力或温和至中等的听力损失的单侧聋障碍。 (c)2018年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号