...
首页> 外文期刊>Assessment >Cross-Validation of Two Commonly Used Self-Stigma Measures, Taiwan Versions of the Internalized Stigma Mental Illness Scale and Self-Stigma Scale–Short, for People With Mental Illness
【24h】

Cross-Validation of Two Commonly Used Self-Stigma Measures, Taiwan Versions of the Internalized Stigma Mental Illness Scale and Self-Stigma Scale–Short, for People With Mental Illness

机译:两种常用自我耻辱措施的交叉验证,台湾内部化的耻辱精神疾病规模和自我耻辱鳞片短,为患有精神疾病的人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Self-stigma instruments investigate how people with mental illness internalize public stigma. However, information is limited for the psychometric properties of their scores, especially cross-validating scores from different instruments. Thus, we used confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) and item-response theory (IRT) models to examine the Internalized Stigma Mental Illness (ISMI) scale and the Self-Stigma Scale–Short (SSS-S). Participants with mental illness ( n = 347) completed both instruments. The CFAs that simultaneously accounted for both the instrument (ISMI and SSS-S) and the trait (Affect, Cognitive, and Behavior concepts) effects outperformed those that accounted only for the instrument effect or only the trait effect. All item scores fit the IRT model and were fit with ordered, progressing hierarchies in their step difficulties. We conclude that both instruments are feasible for measuring the self-stigma and that future research can combine the items of both.
机译:自我耻辱仪器调查精神疾病的人如何内化公众耻辱。 然而,信息有限于他们得分的心理学属性,特别是来自不同仪器的交叉验证分数。 因此,我们使用了确认因子分析(CFAS)和项目 - 响应理论(IRT)模型来检查内部化的耻辱精神疾病(ISMI)规模和自我耻辱秤 - 短(SSS-S)。 有精神疾病的参与者(n = 347)完成了这两种文书。 同时占仪器(ISMI和SSS-S)和特征(影响,认知和行为概念)效果的CFA效应的效果优于仪器效应或仅为特征效果计算的那些。 所有项目分数适合IRT模型,并适合订购,进展步骤困难。 我们得出结论,两种仪器都是可行的,可用于测量自我耻辱,未来的研究可以将两者的物品结合在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号