首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Factors Influencing Management and Outcome in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer with Axillary Lymph Node Involvement: Analysis of the National Cancer Database
【24h】

Factors Influencing Management and Outcome in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer with Axillary Lymph Node Involvement: Analysis of the National Cancer Database

机译:影响血栓碱癌患者管理和结果的因素腋窝淋巴结参与:国家癌症数据库分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Occult breast cancer (OBC) is rare and optimal local–regional (LR) management has not been defined. Using a patient registry database, we examine factors associated with treatment and outcomes in OBC. Methods Female patients with cT0?N1/2?M0 BC were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004–2013) and categorized into four treatment groups: MAST?=?mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)?±?radiation (RT); RT?+?ALND?=?RT with ALND, no breast surgery; ALND?=?ALND alone; OBS?=?no breast surgery, RT, or ALND. Patient characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with treatment and OS. Results Among 2.03 million BC cases, 1853 females (0.09%) with cT0?N1/2?M0 disease were identified and 1231 patients were categorized into a treatment group: MAST?=?592, RT?+?ALND?=?342, ALND?=?106, OBS?=?191. On logistic regression, care at an academic center was associated with a higher likelihood of RT?+?ALND compared with MAST (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50–2.74, p ? p ?=?0.001). RT?+?ALND was independently associated with OS on multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.509, 95% CI 0.321–0.808, p ?=?0.004), after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions Patients with OBC were more likely to undergo RT?+?ALND if they received care at an academic center. Patients treated with RT?+?ALND had significantly better OS compared with patients treated with MAST, after adjusting for covariates. This supports the use of RT?+?ALND as LR treatment for patients with OBC.
机译:摘要背景隐匿性乳腺癌(OBC)是罕见的,最佳的地方 - 区域(LR)管理尚未确定。使用患者注册表数据库,我们检查与OBC的治疗和结果相关的因素。方法患有CT0的女性患者吗?N1 / 2?M0 BC选自国家癌症数据库(2004-2013),并分为四个治疗组:桅杆?α=?肿瘤淋巴结解剖(ALND)?±γ辐射(RT ); Rt?+αα=α=?&n&n alnd,没有乳房手术; alnd?=?单独alnd; OBS?=?没有乳房手术,RT或ALND。在组之间比较患者特征和整体存活(OS),并且使用多变量分析来鉴定与治疗和OS相关的因素。结果20.3万个BC病例,1853例女性(0.09%),鉴定了N1 / 2?M0疾病,将1231名患者分为治疗组:桅杆?=?592,RT?+?alnd?=?342, alnd?=?106,obs?=?191。在Logistic回归中,在学术中心的护理与RT?+αα的似乎与桅杆相比更高的似然相关(差距2.03,95%置信区间[CI] 1.50-2.74,P?P?= 0.001)。在调整协变量后,RTα+α+αα+ααsαs与OS独立相关(HR 0.509,95%CI 0.321-0.808,P?= 0.004)。结论如果他们在学术中心收到护理,则患有OBC的患者更有可能接受RT?+?ALND。在调整协变量后,用RTα+α+αα+αα的患者具有明显更好的操作系统。这支持使用OBC患者的RTα+α+ααAlND作为LR治疗。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Annals of surgical oncology》 |2017年第10期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Division of General and Oncologic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Maryland School of;

    Department of Radiation Oncology University of Maryland School of Medicine;

    Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Maryland School of;

    Division of General and Oncologic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Maryland School of;

    Department of Radiation Oncology University of Maryland School of Medicine;

    Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Maryland School of;

    Department of Radiation Oncology University of Maryland School of Medicine;

    Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Maryland School of Medicine;

    Division of General and Oncologic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Maryland School of;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号