首页> 外文期刊>Archives of sexual behavior >Sexual Health Risk Behavior Disparities Among Male and Female Adolescents Using Identity and Behavior Indicators of Sexual Orientation
【24h】

Sexual Health Risk Behavior Disparities Among Male and Female Adolescents Using Identity and Behavior Indicators of Sexual Orientation

机译:使用性定位身份和行为指标的男性和女性青少年性健康风险行为差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sexual minority adolescent sexual risk behavior studies often overlook young women, do not consider behavior- and identity-based sexual orientation indicators in combination, and focus mainly on condomless sex. We examined multiple risk behaviors in a large sample of adolescent young men and women using combined behavior- and identity-based indices. The 2015 Dane County Youth Assessment data included 4734 students in 22 high schools who had ever voluntarily engaged in sexual contact (51.7% male; 76.0% White, non-Hispanic). Items assessed having sex with unfamiliar partners, sex while using substances, using protection, and STI testing. Logistic regressions tested for disparities based on combined identity- and behavior-based sexual orientation indicators. For both young men and women, youth who reported heterosexual or questioning identities-but who had sex with same-sex partners-were at consistently greater risk than heterosexual youth with only different-sex partners. Also, for both young men and women, bisexuals with partners of both sexes more consistently reported higher risk than heterosexual youth than did bisexuals with only different-sex partners. Risk behavior for gay young men who had sex only with men mirrored those in extant literature. Risk levels differed for specific groups of sexual minority young women, thus deserving further attention. Findings underscore the need for sexual health research to consider sexual orientation in a more multidimensional manner.
机译:性少数群体青少年性风险行为研究往往忽略年轻女性,不要相结合考虑行为和基于身份的性取向指标,主要集中在公寓性交方面。我们在使用组合行为和基于身份的指数中检查了在大型青少年男性和女性样本中的多种风险行为。 2015年丹麦县青年评估数据包括22名高中的4734名学生,他们曾自愿从事性接触(51.7%男性; 76.0%白色,非西班牙裔。评估物品与不熟悉的合作伙伴进行性关系,使用物质的性爱,使用保护和STI测试。基于组合的身份和行为的性取向指标测试的差距测试了逻辑回归。对于年轻人和女性来说,报告异性恋或质疑身份的青年 - 但与同性合作伙伴发生性关系 - 只有不同性伴侣的异性恋青年持续更大的风险。此外,对于年轻男性和女性,双性恋与两性的合作伙伴更始终报告的风险高于异性恋青年,而不是只有不同性伴侣的双性恋。仅与男人发生性性的同性恋年轻人的风险行为反映了那些现存文学的人。风险水平对于特定的性少数群体群体的危险程度不同,因此值得进一步关注。调查结果强调性健康研究需要以更多样的方式考虑性取向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号