Conceptual, methodological, and clinical considerations for a core outcome set for discourse

de Riesthal Michael; Diehl Sarah K.

首页> 外文期刊>Aphasiology >Conceptual, methodological, and clinical considerations for a core outcome set for discourse

【24h】

Conceptual, methodological, and clinical considerations for a core outcome set for discourse

机译：用于话语的核心结果的概念性，方法论和临床考虑因素

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Aphasiology》 |2018年第6期|共3页
作者
de Riesthal Michael; Diehl Sarah K.;
展开▼
作者单位

Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med Hearing &

Speech Sci Nashville TN 37212 USA;

Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med Hearing &

Speech Sci Nashville TN 37212 USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类神经病学与精神病学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Conceptual, methodological, and clinical considerations for a core outcome set for discourse [J] . de Riesthal Michael, Diehl Sarah K. Aphasiology . 2018,第4a6期

机译：用于话语的核心结果的概念性，方法论和临床考虑因素
2. Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets [J] . IdzerdaL., RaderT., TugwellP., The Journal of rheumatology . 2014,第5期

机译：我们可以决定在每个临床试验中应该测量哪些结果吗？对现有概念框架和流程进行范围界定的审查，以开发核心成果集
3. Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets [J] . IdzerdaL., RaderT., TugwellP., The Journal of rheumatology . 2014,第5期

机译：我们可以决定在每次临床试验中测量哪些结果？对现有概念框架和流程的范围审查，以开发核心结果集
4. USE OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGIES TO IDENTIFY A CORE OUTCOME SET (COS) FOR FELINE CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE RESEARCH [C] . Meeting of The Society^for^Veterinary^Epidemiology^and^Preventive^Medicine^(Great^Britain). . 2020

机译：使用定量和定性方法来识别猫科动物慢性肾病研究的核心结果组（COS）
5. A fuzzy set model of consideration set formation: Theory, methodology, and calibration using data from an online supermarket. [D] . Wu, Jianan. 1998

机译：考虑因素集合形成的模糊集合模型：理论，方法和使用来自在线超级市场的数据进行的校准。
6. Methodology in core outcome set (COS) development: the impact of patient interviews and using a 5-point versus a 9-point Delphi rating scale on core outcome selection in a COS development study [O] . Alexandria Remus, Valerie Smith, Francesca Wuytack 2021

机译：核心结果集（COS）开发的方法：患者访谈的影响和使用5点与9分Delphi评级规模在COS开发研究中选择
7. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in facial aging: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey [O] . Daniel I. Schlessinger, Sanjana Iyengar, Arianna F. Yanes, 2017

机译：面部衰老临床试验核心结果的发展：研究方案，用于系统审查文献的审查和鉴定使用Delphi调查组的核心结果

Conceptual, methodological, and clinical considerations for a core outcome set for discourse

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅