首页> 外文期刊>Annals of hematology >Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) followed by BEAM (Z-BEAM) conditioning regimen and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in relapsed or refractory high-risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): a single institution Italian experience
【24h】

Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) followed by BEAM (Z-BEAM) conditioning regimen and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in relapsed or refractory high-risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): a single institution Italian experience

机译:Yttrium-90 ibritumomab Tiuxetan(Zevalin)随后是梁(Z-梁)调节方案和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)复发或难治性高风险B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL):一种机构意大利经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemo-refractory NHL has a very poor outcome; the addiction of RIT to salvage regiment pre ASCT had recently demonstrated promising results.We performed a retrospective sequential study to determine the feasibility of standard Zevalin with BEAM in high-risk relapse/refractory NHL. A matched cohort analysis with a group treated with standard BEAM without Zevalin was performed as secondary endpoint. Between October 2006 and January 2013, 37 NHL patients at high risk for progression or early ( 1 year) or multiple relapses were treated with Z-BEAM and ASCT after R-DHAP or R-ICE as salvage therapy. Clinical characteristics were 19 refractory and 18 early or multiple relapse; 16 patients received 1, and 21 had 2 or more previous rituximab-containing chemotherapy. At the end of treatment, response was CR 22 (59%), PR 10 (27%), PD 4 (11%), and toxic death (TD) 1 (3%). With a median follow up of 61 months, 3-year PFS was 61% and OS 61%. Fifteen patients died, 12 of lymphoma. Comparison with 21 treated with BEAM alone showed a numerical higher 3-yr PFS rate in favor of Z-BEAM but not statistically significant (57 vs 48%). With the limitation of the small sample subgroup analysis, a significant benefit was observed in relapsed patients for PFS (78% Z-BEAM vs 22% BEAM p = 0.016) and OS (83% Z-BEAM vs 22% BEAM p = 0.001). In relapsed/refractory high-risk NHL, Z-BEAM+ASCT is able to achieve a good ORR. Three-year PFS is promising for early relapsed patients but is not satisfactory for those with refractory disease.
机译:Chemo-Remerge NHL的结果非常差; RIT对抢救法的成瘾前ASCT最近展示了有希望的结果。我们进行了回顾性连续研究,以确定标准Zevalin在高风险复发/难治性NHL中的梁的可行性。用没有Zevalin的标准梁处理的匹配的队列分析作为辅助端点进行。 2006年10月至2013年1月期间,在R-DHAP或R-ICE之后用Z光束和ASCT处理37名NHL患者的进展性高或早期(& 1年)或多重复发。临床特征是19个难治性,早期或多重复发; 16名患者接受1和21例以前的含生妥昔单抗的化疗。在治疗结束时,响应是Cr 22(59%),Pr 10(27%),Pd 4(11%),毒性死亡(Td)1(3%)。中位于61个月后,3年的PFS为61%,OS 61%。十五名患者死亡,12例淋巴瘤。单独用光束处理21的比较显示了数值高于3-YR PFS率,有利于Z光束但没有统计学意义(57 Vs 48%)。随着小样品亚组分析的局限性,在复发的PFS患者中观察到显着的益处(78%Z光束Vs 22%光束P = 0.016)和OS(83%Z束与22%光束P = 0.001) 。在复发/难治性高风险NHL中,Z光束+ ASCT能够达到良好的ORR。为期三年的PFS对早期复发的患者有前途,但对于具有难治性疾病的人来说并不令人满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号