...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of industrial medicine >The work‐related stressors and coping strategies of group‐employed rural health care practitioners: A qualitative study
【24h】

The work‐related stressors and coping strategies of group‐employed rural health care practitioners: A qualitative study

机译:与雇用的农村卫生保健从业人员的工作有关的压力园和应对策略:一个定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Escalating demands on practitioners, stagnating/dwindling resources, and diminishing autonomy have heightened patient‐care work‐related stress. Using qualitative content/thematic analysis of responses to open‐ended survey questions, plus spontaneous comments, we sought to identify rural clinicians’ subjective perceptions of their workplace stressors and typical adaptive/coping strategies. Methods Within a hybrid inductive‐deductive approach, we framed empirical themes (derived by consensus, corroborated with text segments, and extant literature) into theory‐based coding templates by which we analyzed the data. Results Of 308 (65.1% of) recipients completing questionnaires, 290 (94%) answered open‐ended questions and/or provided comments. Categorizing stressors by socio‐ecology, they cited four themes: Organizational, practitioner/staff‐related, patient‐related, and third party‐induced stressors. Organizational stressors were referenced most conspicuously. How respondents described their coping fitted the Stress, Appraisal and Coping. [Lazarus and Folkman (1984): New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc] model. Emotion‐focused were referenced more than problem‐focused approaches. Themes scarcely differed by demographics, except for marital status. Conclusions Findings highlight needs for resilience coaching, rekindling work meaningfulness, mentorship in work‐home balance/limit‐setting, supportive peer networks, and deeper teamwork.
机译:背景技术对从业者,停滞/减少资源和减少自主权的需求,提高了患者护理工作相关的压力。利用对开放式调查问题的响应的定性内容/专题分析,以及自发性评论,我们试图识别农村临床医生对其工作场所压力源的主观看法以及典型的适应性/应对策略。方法在混合归纳 - 演绎方法中,我们将经验主题(通过协商一致,文本段和现存文献提供)进入基于理论的编码模板,我们分析了数据。结果308(65.1%)接受者完成问卷,290(94%)回答了开放式问题和/或提供的意见。他们通过社会生态分类了压力,他们引用了四个主题:组织,从业者/员工相关,有关的患者相关和第三方引起的压力源。组织压力源是最明显的。受访者如何描述他们的应对压力,评估和应对。 [拉撒尔斯和民间人(1984年):纽约,纽约:Springer Publishing Company,Inc]型号。情绪关注的是引用的不仅仅是以问题为中心的方法。除了婚姻状况外,人口统计学几乎没有不同的主题。结论调查结果强调了恢复力辅导的需求,重新支持工作有意义,工作室余额/限制设置,支持性同行网络和更深入的团队合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号