首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >Autocalibrating pulse contour analysis based on radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in intensive care unit patients after major gastrointestinal surgery-a prospective method comparison study
【24h】

Autocalibrating pulse contour analysis based on radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in intensive care unit patients after major gastrointestinal surgery-a prospective method comparison study

机译:基于桡动脉施置脉冲调节性的高型脉冲脉冲轮廓分析,用于重症监护单位患者在主要胃肠外科手术中的连续无侵袭性心输出监测 - 一种预期方法对比研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The T-Line (R) system (Tensys (R) Medical Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) non-invasively estimates cardiac output (CO) using autocalibrating pulse contour analysis of the radial artery applanation tonometry derived arterial waveform. We compared T-Line CO measurements (TL-CO) with invasively obtained CO measurements using transpulmonary thermodilution (TD-CO) and calibrated pulse contour analysis (PC-CO) in patients after major gastrointestinal surgery. We compared 1) TL-CO versus TD-CO and 2) TL-CO versus PC-CO in 27 patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) after major gastrointestinal surgery. For the assessment of TD-CO and PC-CO we used the PiCCO (R) system (Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Feldkirchen, Germany). Per patient, we compared two sets of TD-CO and 30 minutes of PC-CO measurements with the simultaneously recorded IL-CO values using Bland Altman analysis. The mean of differences (standard deviation; 95% limits of agreement) between IL-CO and TD-CO was -0.8 (+/- 1.6; -4.0 to +2.3) l/minute with a percentage error of 45%. For IL-CO versus PC-CO, we observed a mean of differences of -0.4 (+/- 1.5; -3.4 to +2.5) l/minute with a percentage error of 43%. In ICU patients after major gastrointestinal surgery, continuous non-invasive CO measurement based on autocalibrating pulse contour analysis of the radial artery applanation tonometry derived arterial waveform (TL-CO) is feasible in a clinical study setting. However, the agreement of TL-CO with TD-CO and PC-CO observed in our study indicates that further improvements are needed before the technology can be recommended for clinical use in these patients.
机译:T-Line(R)系统(Tensys(R)医疗公司,San Diego,CA,USA)使用桡动脉施加型动脉波形的高型动脉施加脉搏分析来非侵入地估计心输出(CO)。我们将T线CO测量(TL-CO)与在主要胃肠外科手术后患者中的经母液热稀释(TD-CO)和校准的脉冲轮廓分析(PC-CO)进行了侵袭性的CO测量。我们的比较了1)TL-CO与TD-CO和2)TL-CO与PC-CO,在重症监护室(ICU)中治疗的27名患者中,在重大胃肠外科手术后。对于TD-CO和PC-CO的评估,我们使用了PICCO(R)系统(Pulsion Medical Systems SE,Feldkirchen,Germany)。每位患者,我们将两组TD-CO和30分钟的PC-CO测量与使用Bland Altman分析的同时记录的IL-Co值进行了比较。 IL-Co和TD-Co之间的差异(标准偏差; 95%的协议限制)为-0.8(+/- 1.6; -4.0至+2.3)l /分钟,百分比误差为45%。对于IL-Co对PC-CO,我们观察到差异为-0.4(+/- 1.5; -3.4至+2.5)l /分钟,百分比误差为43%。在ICU患者在主要胃肠外科患者中,基于高压动脉施加型脉冲调制衍生动脉波形(TL-CO)的连续无侵入性CO测量在临床研究环境中是可行的。然而,我们研究中观察到的TD-Co和PC-Co的TL-CO协议表明,在这些患者中推荐技术临床上使用之前需要进一步改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号