首页> 外文期刊>American pharmaceutical review >Dead Zone: Are Your Biological Products Ready for FDA’s Regulatory Transition?
【24h】

Dead Zone: Are Your Biological Products Ready for FDA’s Regulatory Transition?

机译:死区:您的生物产品是否准备好FDA的监管过渡?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On March 23, 2020, hundreds of approved and pending applications for biological products will face a regulatory transition as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implements the "deemed to be a license"provision of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA). On that date, FDA will replace all approved new drug applications (NDAs) and abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for biologics with biologic license applications (BLAs) or abbreviated biologic license applications (aBLAs), remove these applications and their patents from the FDA's Orange Book, and largely extinguish the products' regulatory exclusivities. FDA will also reject all pending NDAs and ANDAs for biologies, requiring their resubmission as BLAs or aBLAs. Pharmaceutical companies and industry organizations have responded that these actions would constitute unlawful government takings and cause a regulatory dead zone wherein companies cannot gain FDA approval for follow-on biologies through any type of application. Despite guidance from FDA, significant uncertainty remains for pharmaceutical companies regarding their approved and pending applications and associated patent litigations. This article introduces the law underpinning FDA's regulatory transition, discusses FDA's interpretation of that law, and identifies issues that pharmaceutical companies should be considering now.
机译:2020年3月23日,为美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)实施“被视为牌照”提供2009年生物制剂价格竞争和创新法案的“被视为牌照”的监管过渡。 (BPCIA)。在此日期,FDA将替换所有批准的新药应用(NDA)和缩写的新药物应用(ANDAS)为生物学许可证申请(BLA)或缩写的生物许可证申请(ABLAS),从FDA中删除这些应用程序及其专利橙色书,并在很大程度上熄灭了产品的监管专属。 FDA还将拒绝所有待申请的NDA和ANDAS进行生物学,要求他们重新提交为BLAS或ABLAS。制药公司和工业组织已回答说,这些行动将构成非法政府的作动,并导致监管死区,其中公司无法通过任何类型的申请获得对后续生物制剂的FDA批准。尽管FDA指导,但制药公司的指导仍然是关于其批准和待申请和相关专利诉讼的制药公司的重大不确定性。本文介绍了基于FDA的监管过渡的法律,讨论了FDA对该法律的解释,并确定了制药公司现在应该考虑的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号