首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA)
【24h】

Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA)

机译:吸入甲氧基氟醚对急性创伤疼痛的镇痛疗效,实用性和安全性,急性创伤疼痛治疗急性环境:意大利随机,开放标签,主动控制,多期式试验(麦田)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain. Methods This was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score >= 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS >= 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane-SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively. Results Between 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference - 5.94 mm; 95% CI - 8.83, - 3.06 mm), moderate pain (- 5.97 mm; 95% CI - 9.55, - 2.39 mm) and severe pain (- 5.54 mm; 95% CI - 10.49, - 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated "Excellent", "Very Good" or "Good" by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients. Conclusion Methoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option. Funding Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l.
机译:引入吸入低剂量甲氧基氟醚在欧洲批准用于急诊释放成人中度至严重的创伤疼痛,但数据与活性比较器稀疏。意大利急诊科(METITA)试验中的IIIB型甲氧基氟醚研究甲氧基氟醚对急性创伤疼痛的镇痛效果,实用性和安全性对标准镇痛治疗(SAT)。方法这是在15个意大利紧急单位中进行的随机,主动控制,并行组,开放标签试验。具有肢体创伤和疼痛评分的成年人> = 4在数值额定标度(NRS)上随机1:1吸入甲氧基氟醚3ml或静脉注射[静脉内给药(IV)吗啡0.1mg / kg剧烈疼痛(NRS> = 7);静脉乙酰氨基酚1g或静脉酮酮100mg用于中等疼痛(NRS 4-6)]。主要终点是从基线(随机时间)到3,5和10分钟的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛强度的总体变化。结束了处理比较(甲氧基氟醚-AT)的上95%置信区间(CI)分别小于1且小于0,则甲氧基氟脲与饱和度的不较弱和优越性。结果2018年2月8日至2019年2月8日,272名患者随机化(每次治疗组136岁)。共有270名患者(平均年龄51岁; 49%雄性; 34%,严重疼痛;平均基线VAS 67mm)进行治疗和分析疗效和安全性。证明了甲氧基氟醚的优越性用于中度至剧烈的疼痛(调整平均处理差异 - 5.94mm; 95%Ci-8.83, - 3.06 mm),中等疼痛( - 5.97 mm; 95%CI-9.55, - 2.39 mm)和剧烈疼痛( - 5.54 mm; 95%CI - 10.49, - 0.59 mm)。静止疼痛缓解的中位数为甲氧基氟醚9分钟,饱和15分钟。甲氧基氟醚处理的实用性被评为“优异的”,“非常好”或“良好”的90%的临床医生与饱和64%。据报道,17%的甲氧基氟醚处理的患者和3%的SAT治疗患者的不良事件(所有非严重)。结论甲氧基氟醚提供优异的疼痛缓解,坐落在中度至严重的创伤疼痛患者中,可以提供简单,快速,有效的非阿片类药物治疗选择。资助Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.R.L.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号