首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Combining generalized complementary relationship models with the Bayesian Model Averaging method to estimate actual evapotranspiration over China
【24h】

Combining generalized complementary relationship models with the Bayesian Model Averaging method to estimate actual evapotranspiration over China

机译:将广义互补关系模型与贝叶斯模型平均法相结合,以估算中国实际蒸散量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evapotranspiration, commonly classified as actual evapotranspiration (AET), wet evapotranspiration (WET), and potential evapotranspiration (PET), is an important component of hydrological processes. Several models have been developed for estimating AET, but none are applicable under all conditions due to the complexity of the algorithms and limitations in parameterization. However, PET and WET can be easily calculated using several simple equations based on available climate data. In this study, a regional reanalysis dataset, the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Dataset for the SWAT model (CMADS), was used to estimate PET and WET, and a generalized complementary relationship (GCR) was used to convert from PET and WET to AET. Then a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method was applied to merge the GCR-based AETs to improve the accuracy of AET estimations in China. After examining the performance of GCR and BMA models at the flux tower sites in different climate zones, we found that other PET models were better than the PM model for predicting AET using GCR. In addition, the BMA estimations were closer to flux tower observations than were those of the GCR-based AET in each climate zone. The average RMSE of BMA-merged AET was reduced to 0.66 mm/day, compared to 1.82 mm/day in the original GCR model. Moreover, the performance of AET estimated by CMADS and other AET products, such as the Global Land Data Assimilation System and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Global Evapotranspiration Project was examined at the flux tower sites. The results showed that the CMADS AET product performed better than other AET products in each climate zone with better statistical values. In general, the results showed that the GCR estimates are promising when combined with BMA for future studies to characterize global AET.
机译:蒸发,通常被分类为实际蒸发(AET),湿蒸发(湿)和潜在的蒸散蒸腾(PET),是水文过程的重要组成部分。已经开发了几种型号用于估计AET,但由于算法的复杂性和参数化的限制,因此无处不适用。然而,可以使用基于可用的气候数据的几个简单方程来容易地计算PET和湿法。在这项研究中,用于估计宠物和湿法的区域再分析数据集,中国气象同化驾驶数据集(CMADS),用于估计宠物和湿法,并使用广义互补关系(GCR)从PET和湿到AET。然后应用贝叶斯模型(BMA)方法来合并基于GCR的AET以提高中国AET估计的准确性。在检查不同气候区的通量塔网站上的GCR和BMA模型的性能后,我们发现其他PET模型优于PM模型,用于使用GCR预测AET。此外,BMA估计比每个气候区中的​​基于GCR的AET的磁通塔观测更接近通量塔观察。 BMA合并AET的平均RMSE降至0.66毫米/天,而原始GCR模型中的1.82毫米/天。此外,通过CMAD和其他AET产品估计的AET的性能,例如全球土地数据同化系统和中等分辨率成像分光镜全局蒸发散流程被检查在助焊器塔部位。结果表明,CMADS AET产品比每个气候区中的​​其他AET产品更好,具有更好的统计值。一般来说,结果表明,GCR估计与BMA结合以供未来的研究表征全球AET时,估计是有前途的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号