首页> 外文期刊>Advanced Science Letters >The Comparison of Participation Level Between Urban-Type and Rural-Type Community in Supporting the Community-Based Village Road Development Program
【24h】

The Comparison of Participation Level Between Urban-Type and Rural-Type Community in Supporting the Community-Based Village Road Development Program

机译:城市型和农村社区参与水平的比较,支持社区村路发展计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Indonesia still faces many challenges to overcome the problem of the availability of basic infrastructure of settlement, especially for rural community. The limited resources possessed by the government have resulted in the empowerment of community to fulfill its basic infrastructure.One of the strategies taken is to develop various development programs based on community empowerment. Based on some experiences, the implementation of this strategy shows that there are various issues that need to be understood better. One of them is related to the characteristics of thebeneficiary. This strategy will be more suitable if it is applied to rural-type community rather than to urban-type community. This paper illustrates one of the results of a case study of village road construction program in the Regency of Magetan, East Java. This qualitative study attemptsto compare the implementation of the village road development program of two villages with different characteristics, namely Dadi Village, District of Plaosan-representing the highland/rural areas- and Malang Village, District of Maospatirepresenting lowland/urban areas. The study finds thatthe community with the rural characteristic is more suitable for implementing this program because of several things; First, this approach tends to raise conflict among parties, hence, a face-to-face interaction existing in the village community can minimize the chances of this conflict; Second,the presence of community leaders who plays an important role in mobilizing community resources are more easily found in rural communities; Third, although rural characteristics are socially more suitable, yet, in order to maintain the quality of construction carried out by the community basedon the prevailing standards, there should be a Technical Service Unit that oversees and accompanies the community.
机译:印度尼西亚仍然面临着许多挑战,克服了解决的基本基础设施的问题,特别是农村社区。政府拥有的有限资源导致社区赋予履行其基本基础设施。所采取的战略是根据社区赋权制定各种发展方案。基于一些经验,实现这一策略的实施表明,需要更好地理解各种问题。其中一个与“enfificial的特征有关。如果应用于农村型社区而不是城市型社区,这种策略将更加合适。本文说明了东爪哇省MageTan的村庄道路建设计划的案例研究结果之一。这种定性研究速度比较了两个村庄的村路发展方案的实施,其中包括不同特点,即普拉萨区的Dadi Village,代表高地/农村地区和Malang Village,Maospatirepresenting低地/城市地区。该研究发现,由于几件事,具有农村特征的社区更适合实施该计划;首先,这种方法往往促进各方之间的冲突,因此,村庄社区存在的面对面互动可以最大限度地减少这种冲突的机会;其次,在农村社区中更容易发现在动员社区资源中发挥重要作用的社区领导人;第三,虽然农村特色是社会上更合适的,但为了维持社区的施工质量,仍然是普遍的标准,应该有一个技术服务部门监督和伴随着社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号