首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review
【24h】

The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review

机译:使用计算机辅助检测(CAD)对乳腺癌筛查乳腺癌检测的功效:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Early detection of breast cancer (BC) is crucial in lowering the mortality. Purpose To present an overview of studies concerning computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography for early detection of BC and compare diagnostic accuracy and recall rates (RR) of single reading (SR) with SR + CAD and double reading (DR) with SR + CAD. Material and Methods PRISMA guidelines were used as a review protocol. Articles on clinical trials concerning CAD for detection of BC in a screening population were included. The literature search resulted in 1522 records. A total of 1491 records were excluded by abstract and 18 were excluded by full text reading. A total of 13 articles were included. Results All but two studies from the SR vs. SR + CAD group showed an increased sensitivity and/or cancer detection rate (CDR) when adding CAD. The DR vs. SR + CAD group showed no significant differences in sensitivity and CDR. Adding CAD to SR increased the RR and decreased the specificity in all but one study. For the DR vs. SR + CAD group only one study reported a significant difference in RR. Conclusion All but two studies showed an increase in RR, sensitivity and CDR when adding CAD to SR. Compared to DR no statistically significant differences in sensitivity or CDR were reported. Additional studies based on organized population-based screening programs, with longer follow-up time, high-volume readers, and digital mammography are needed to evaluate the efficacy of CAD.
机译:背景技术乳腺癌(BC)的早期检测对于降低死亡率至关重要。目的介绍关于筛选乳房X线摄影的计算机辅助检测(CAD)的研究概述,以便与​​SR + CAD进行单读(SR)的单读(SR)的诊断精度和召回速率(RR)以及双读(DR)进行比较SR + CAD。材料和方法PRISMA指南被用作审查议定书。包括关于CAD的临床试验的文章,用于检测筛查人群中的BC。文献搜索导致1522条记录。摘要共排除了1491条记录,并通过全文阅读排除18条。共有13篇文章。结果除了SR和SR + CAD组的两项研究均有两种研究表现出加入CAD时的敏感性和/或癌症检测率(CDR)增加。博士与SR + CAD组显示敏感性和CDR没有显着差异。将CAD添加到SR增加了RR并降低了除一项研究之外的特异性。对于博士与SR + CAD组只有一项研究报告了RR的显着差异。结论除了两项研究的所有研究表明,加入CAD时,RR,敏感性和CDR增加。与DR没有统计学上没有敏感性差异或CDR的差异。需要基于有组织的基于人口的筛查计划,需要更长的随访时间,大容量读者和数字乳房X线照片来评估CAD的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号