...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Histochemica: Zeitschrift fur Histologische Topochemie >Telocytes and lymphatic endothelial cells: Two immunophenotypically distinct and spatially close cell entities
【24h】

Telocytes and lymphatic endothelial cells: Two immunophenotypically distinct and spatially close cell entities

机译:鸟束和淋巴内皮细胞:两个免疫蛋白型不同和空间密闭的细胞实体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Telocytes (TCs) have recently emerged as a peculiar type of stromal cells located in both perivascular and interstitial compartments of multiple anatomical sites in humans, other mammals and vertebrates. Pioneer electron microscopy studies have ultrastructurally defined TCs as "stromal cells with telopodes" (Le. very long and thin cell processes with a moniliform morphology conferred by the irregular alternation of slender segments and small, bead-like, dilated portions), whereupon it has become apparent that TCs largely correspond to the CD34 + stromal/interstitial cells detectable by immunohistochemical assays. Besides CD34, TCs are also characterized by the expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)alpha. Interestingly, recent works recommended that lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) markers should be routinely assessed to discriminate with certainty TCs from LECs, because these two cell types may exhibit similar morphological traits, especially when initial lymphatics are sectioned longitudinally and appear as vascular profiles with no obvious lumen. Furthermore, it has been argued that lymphatic microvessels immunostained for the small mucin-type transmembrane glycoprotein podoplanin (PDPN), which is widely used as lymphatic endothelial marker, can be easily misidentified as TCs. Nevertheless, surprisingly these assumptions were not based on double tissue immunostaining for TC and LEC markers. Therefore, the present morphological study was undertaken to precisely investigate the mutual spatial organization and putative relationships of TCs and lymphatic vessels in tissues from different human organs. For this purpose, we carried out a series of double immunofluorescence analyses simultaneously detecting the CD34 or PDGFR alpha antigen and a marker of LECs, either PDPN or lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1). In the connective tissue compartment of different organs, TCs were CD34 + /PDGFR alpha + /PDPN - /LYVE-1 - while LECs were CD34 - /PDGFR alpha - /PDPN + /LYVE-1 +, thus representing two definitely distinct, though spatially close, cell entities. The arrangement of telopodes to intimately surround the abluminal side of LECs suggests a possible role of TCs in the regulation of lymphatic capillary functionality, which is worth investigating further.
机译:最近迄今为止作为位于人类,其他哺乳动物和脊椎动物的多重解剖部位的血管外和间隙隔间的特殊类型的基质细胞类型。先驱电子显微镜研究具有超微结构地定义的TCS作为“具有焦点的基质细胞”(LE。具有由细长段的不规则交替赋予的单格式形态的长且薄细胞过程,所以它具有小,珠状,扩张的部分的不规则交替),因此它具有显而易见的是,TCS在很大程度上对应于免疫组织化学测定可检测到的CD34 +基质/间质细胞。除CD34外,TC还具有表达血小板衍生的生长因子受体(PDGFR)α的表达。有趣的是,最近的作品建议淋巴内皮细胞(LEC)标志物应常规评估,以与LECs确定的确定性TCS区分,因为这两种细胞类型可能表现出类似的形态性状,特别是当初始淋巴管纵向切片并且出现血管谱时,没有明显的腔。此外,已经认为,用于小粘蛋白型跨膜糖蛋白(PDPN)的淋巴微血管免疫染色,其被广泛用作淋巴内皮标记物,可以容易地被误识别为TCS。然而,令人惊讶的是,这些假设不是基于针对TC和LEC标记的双组织免疫染色。因此,对本文的形态学研究进行了精确研究来自不同人道器官组织中TCS和淋巴管的互相空间组织和推定关系。为此目的,我们进行了一系列双重免疫荧光分析,同时检测CD34或PDGFRα抗原和LECs的标志物,PDPN或淋巴管内皮透明质酸锰受体-1(Lyve-1)。在不同器官的结缔组织隔室中,TCS是CD34 + / PDGFRα+ / PDPN - / Lyve-1 - 而LECS是CD34 - / PDGFRα - / PDPN + / Lyve-1 +,但是表示两个绝对不同,但空间关闭,细胞实体。斑点围绕LEC的无纺电方的排列表明TCS在淋巴毛细血管功能调节中的可能作用,这是值得进一步的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号