...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta oncologica. >Age-dependent differences in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the DISCO study
【24h】

Age-dependent differences in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the DISCO study

机译:转移结直肠癌患者的一线化疗依赖于年龄依赖性差异:迪斯科研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: First-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is effective and feasible in selected older patients. We investigated age-dependent differences in treatment and outcomes in patients with mCRC in clinical practice.Material and methods: A retrospective study of 654 patients with mCRC referred to first-line chemotherapy in 2008-2014. Patients were divided into two age groups: 50-69 and >70 (older patients). Binary outcomes were analyzed by logistic regression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression, CRC-specific and other-cause mortality with Fine and Gray proportional hazard model for the sub-distribution of a competing risk. Results: After adjusting for performance status (PS) and comorbidity, older patients were more likely to receive monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.00, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 4.52-17.91), lower doses, and no additional targeted therapy (aOR= 1.89, 95% Cl 1.28-2.78) than younger patients. Yet, older patients experienced more toxicity and hospitalizations (aOR=1.53, 95% Cl 1.08-2.17). Among those treated, older patients had shorter PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32, 95% Cl 1.11-1.57), but after adjusting for PS and comorbidity, PFS was similar. No significant difference was found in CRC mortality (HR=1.15, 95% Cl 0.95-1.40) between age groups. Poor PS was associated with shorter OS and PFS and higher CRC mortality.Conclusions: In the DISCO study, older patients with mCRC received less aggressive first-line chemotherapy. Yet, they experienced more toxicity. Younger and older patients had similar CRC mortality. Shorter PFS and higher CRC mortality were observed in patients with poor PS.Abbreviations: aOR: adjusted odds ratio; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; Capox: capecitabine and oxaliplatin; CGA: comprehensive geriatric assessment; Cl: confidence interval; CRC: colorectal cancer; Folfox: 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin; 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; HR: hazard ratio; mCRC: metastatic colorectal cancer; MSI: microsatellite instability; OR: odds ratio; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; PS: performance status
机译:目标:转移性结肠直肠癌(MCRC)的一线化疗在选定的老年患者中是有效的和可行的。我们在临床实践中调查了MCRC患者治疗和结果的年龄依赖性差异。材料和方法:2008 - 2014年654例MCRC患者的回顾性研究。患者分为两龄龄组:50-69和> 70(老年患者)。通过Logistic回归分析二元成果。通过Cox比例危害回归,CRC特异性和其他引起的死亡率分析了无进展的存活(PFS)和总存活(OS),与细细和灰色比例危害模型进行竞争风险的分布。结果:调整性能状态(PS)和合并症后,老年患者更有可能接受单疗法(调整的差距(AOR)= 9.00,95%置信区间(CL)4.52-17.91),低剂量,没有额外的靶向疗法(AOR = 1.89,95%Cl 1.28-2.78)比年轻患者。然而,老年患者经历了更多的毒性和住院(AOR = 1.53,95%CL 1.08-2.17)。在那些治疗的人中,老年患者的PFS(HR)= 1.32,95%Cl 1.11-1.57),但在调整PS和合并症后,PFS是相似的。在年龄组之间的CRC死亡率(HR = 1.15,95%Cl 0.95-1.40)中没有显着差异。贫困PS与较短的OS和PFS和更高的CRC死亡率相关联然而,他们经历了更多的毒性。年龄较大的患者具有相似的CRC死亡率。较差的PS.Abbreviations患者中观察到较短的PFS和更高的CRC死亡率:AOR:调整赔率比; EGFR:表皮生长因子受体; Capox:Capecitabine和Oxaliplatin; CGA:综合老年评估; CL:置信区间; CRC:结肠直肠癌; folfox:5-氟尿嘧啶和oxaliplatin; 5-fu:5-氟尿嘧啶;人力资源:危险比; MCRC:转移性结肠直肠癌; MSI:微卫星不稳定;或:赔率比; OS:整体生存; PFS:无进展的生存; PS:性能状态

著录项

  • 来源
    《Acta oncologica.》 |2018年第11期|共10页
  • 作者

    Cecilia M. Lund;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Medicine Herlev and Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号