首页> 外文期刊>Cutis >A comparison of knowledge acquisition and perceived efficacy of a traditional vs flipped classroom-based dermatology residency curriculum.
【24h】

A comparison of knowledge acquisition and perceived efficacy of a traditional vs flipped classroom-based dermatology residency curriculum.

机译:传统与传统课堂皮肤科居留课程的传统与传统与传统课程的知识获取和感知疗效的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Flipped and traditional classroom models were compared in the Duke University Medical Center (Durham, North Carolina) dermatology residency program for the 2014-2015 academic year. The residents participated in 12 lectures-6 traditional and 6 flipped-that were paired for similar content. Each lecture was followed by a survey comprised of 10 factual questions and 10 perception questions. Generalized linear regression models were used to study the differences in quiz scores between the 2 classroom models after adjusting for other baseline covariates. There was not a significant difference in mean factual quiz scores between the two classroom models. Results indicated significant perception differences in favor of the flipped classroom model, such as participation (P < .001), enjoyment (P=.038 and P=.026), efficiency (P=.033), and boards (P=.050) and clinical preparedness (P=.034).
机译:在2014-2015学年的Duke University Centre(Durham,北卡罗来纳州)皮肤科居住计划中,将翻转和传统课堂模型进行了比较。 居民参加了12次讲座-6传统和6次翻转 - 用于类似的内容。 每次讲座随后是一个由10个事实问题和10个感知问题组成的调查。 广义线性回归模型用于研究2课堂模型在调整其他基线协变量后的测验分数的差异。 两个课堂模型之间的平均实际测验分数没有显着差异。 结果表明,有利于翻转课堂模型的显着感知差异,如参与(P <.001),享受(P = .038和P = .026),效率(P = .033)和板(P =。 050)和临床准备(p = .034)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号