首页> 外文期刊>Academic psychiatry: the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry >Teaching Medical Ethics in Graduate and Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness
【24h】

Teaching Medical Ethics in Graduate and Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness

机译:研究生和本科医学教育教学医学伦理:效果的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective One objective was to identify and review studies on teaching medical ethics to psychiatry residents. In order to gain insights from other disciplines that have published research in this area, a second objective was to identify and review studies on teaching medical ethics to residents across all other specialties of training and on teaching medical students. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for controlled trials on teaching medical ethics with quantitative outcomes. Search terms included ethics, bioethics, medical ethics, medical students, residents/registrars, teaching, education, outcomes, and controlled trials. Results Nine studies were found that met inclusion criteria, including five randomized controlled trails and four controlled non-randomized trials. Subjects included medical students (5 studies), surgical residents (2 studies), internal medicine house officers (1 study), and family medicine preceptors and their medical students (1 study). Teaching methods, course content, and outcome measures varied considerably across studies. Common methodological issues included a lack of concealment of allocation, a lack of blinding, and generally low numbers of subjects as learners. One randomized controlled trial which taught surgical residents using a standardized patient was judged to be especially methodologically rigorous. Conclusions None of the trials incorporated psychiatry residents. Ethics educators should undertake additional rigorously controlled trials in order to secure a strong evidence base for the design of medical ethics curricula. Psychiatry ethics educators can also benefit from the findings of trials in other disciplines and in undergraduate medical education. ]]>
机译:摘要目标一目标是识别和审查医疗伦理对精神病学居民的研究。为了获得来自该地区研究的其他学科的见解,第二个目标是确定和审查与培训和教学学生教学教学中的居民教学和审查医疗道德教学的研究。方法采用量化,E​​mbase和PSYCINFO进行了有群的定量结果。搜索条件包括道德,生物伦理,医学伦理,医学生,居民/注册商,教学,教育,结果和受控试验。结果发现符合纳入标准,包括五种随机控制迹线和四项受控非随机试验的纳入九项研究。受试者包括医学生(5项研究),外科居民(2项研究),内科官员(1学习),以及家庭医学备注者及其医学生(1学习)。在研究中,教学方法,课程内容和结果措施各方面变化。常见的方法论问题包括缺乏分配的隐瞒,缺乏致盲,甚至是学习者的受试者。判断使用标准化患者教导手术居民的一个随机对照试验,特别是方法论是严格的。结论没有任何试验纳入精神病学居民。道德教育者应承担额外严格的控制试验,以确保医疗伦理课程设计的强有力的基础。精神病学伦理教育者也可以从其他学科和本科医学教育中受益于其他学科的试验结果。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号