...
首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal radiology. >Diffusion-weighted imaging as a part of PET/MR for small lesion detection in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic cancer, with or without TOF reconstruction technique
【24h】

Diffusion-weighted imaging as a part of PET/MR for small lesion detection in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic cancer, with or without TOF reconstruction technique

机译:扩散加权成像作为患有初级腹部和盆腔癌的患者小病灶检测的PET / MR的一部分,有或没有TOF重建技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detection of small lesions (≤ 10 mm) in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic cancer in hybrid PET/MR with or without time-of-flight (TOF) technique. Materials and methods Twenty patients (11 females and 9 males, mean age 67.23 ± 12.90 years) with histologically confirmed primary abdominal and pelvic cancer underwent hybrid PET/MR examination. A total of 64 small lesions were included in this study, which were divided into two groups (≤ 10 mm and 10-30 mm). Visual scores of small lesion detection ability were rated by five-point ordinal scale. The visual scores and detectability of small lesions on TOF PET image, noTOF PET image, and DWI sequences of hybrid PET/MR examination with or without TOF technique were analyzed. Logistic regression model was established for analysis in the value of DWI in hybrid PET/MR examination with or without TOF technique in detection of the small lesions between two groups. Results The visual evaluation revealed the small lesion (≤10 mm) visual scores of DWI (mean±SD: 4.23 ±1.41), TOF PET image (mean±SD: 4.14±0.89), and noTOF PET image (mean±SD: 2.68±1.13);.and the visual scores of small lesions (10-30 mm) on DWI (mean±SD: 4.98±0.15), TOF PET image (mean±SD: 4.57±0.59), and noTOF PET image (mean ± SD: 3.98 ± 1.05). The visual scores of all small lesions on DWI were higher than that on TOF PET data and noTOF PET data in both two groups (**P<0.01). The missed diagnosis rates of small FDG avid lesions (≤ 10 mm) of DWI and noTOF PET image were 9.1% and 9.1%, respectively. However, the TOF PET-based clinical diagnosis detected all small lesions (≤ 30 mm). DWI was of great importance in detection of small lesions (≤ 10 mm) in the absence of TOF technique in PET/MR examination (**P<0.01). DWI's effect on detection of small lesions( 10-30 mm) has shown no difference between PET/MR examinations with TOF and without TOF techniques (P>0.05). Conclusion DWI has significant value in the detection of small lesions (< 10 mm) in hybrid PET/MR examination without TOF technique for patients with primary abdominal and pelvic cancer. However, it had less detection benefits in the small lesions (≤ 10 mm) in hybrid PET/MR examination with TOF PET image.
机译:目的探讨在杂交宠物/ MR中患有原发性腹部和盆腔癌的患者中的小病变(≤10mm)的扩散加权成像(DWI)的价值,有或没有飞行时间(TOF)技术。材料与方法二十名患者(11名女性和9名雄性,平均67.23±12.90年)具有组织学证实的原发性腹部和盆腔癌接受杂交宠物/ MR检查。本研究共用总共64个小病变,其分为两组(≤10mm和10-30mm)。损伤检测能力的视觉评分被五点序号级。分析了TOF宠物图像,NOTOF宠物图像NOTOF宠物图像的小病变的视觉评分和可检测性,具有或不具有TOF技术的杂种宠物/ MR检查的杂交宠物/ MR检查。建立了物流回归模型,用于分析杂交宠物/ MR检查中DWI的价值,或没有TOF技术检测两组的小病变。结果目视评估显示DWI的小病灶(≤10mm)视觉评分(平均值±SD:4.23±1.41),TOF PET图像(平均值±SD:4.14±0.89),NOTOF PET图像(平均值±SD:2.68 ±1.13);和DWI(平均±SD:4.98±0.15),TOF PET图像(平均值±SD:4.57±0.59)和Notof宠物图像(平均值±0.57±0.59)) SD:3.98±1.05)。 DWI上所有小病灶的视觉评分高于TOF宠物数据和两组宠物数据(** P <0.01)。小型FDG狂热病变(≤10mm)的DWI和Notof PET图像的错过诊断率分别为9.1%和9.1%。但是,基于TOF宠物的临床诊断检测到所有小病变(≤30mm)。在没有TOF技术的宠物/ MR检查的情况下,DWI在缺乏TOF技术(** P <0.01)的情况下,DWI非常重要(** P <0.01)。 DWI对小病变检测(10-30mm)的影响表明,PET / MR检查与TOF和无TOF技术之间没有差异(P> 0.05)。结论DWI在杂交宠物/ MR检查中检测小病灶(<10 mm)的检测具有显着的价值,没有TOF技术对初级腹部和盆腔癌的患者。然而,通过TOF PET图像在杂交宠物/ MR检查中的小病变(≤10mm)中的检测益处较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号