...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology >Radiology and Political Advocacy: Characterizing Radiology Political Action Committee Donors
【24h】

Radiology and Political Advocacy: Characterizing Radiology Political Action Committee Donors

机译:放射学和政治倡导:放射学政治行动委员会的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To identify factors associated with radiologist donations to radiology political action committees (PACs). Materials and Methods: A survey was emailed to 4474 radiologists. Factors investigated include demographics, donor history, and knowledge of the federal advocacy process. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with donor behavior. Results: In total, 336 radiologists completed the survey. Overall, 152 (46.2%) radiologists reported donating to a radiology PAC in the past year. Those with annual personal income >$450,000 had greater odds to donate than those with annual personal income <$450,000 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58,95% confidence interval [CI]: 147-4.52; p < 0.001). More than three-quarters (77.2%, n = 254) reported limited or no knowledge of the federal advocacy process. Those with good or excellent knowledge of the federal advocacy process had greater odds to donate than those with no knowledge (OR: 2.63,95% CI: 1.01-6.84; p = 0.047). Those with awareness that membership dues and foundation funds do not fund Society of Interventional Radiology Political Action Committee had greater odds to donate (OR: 3.54,95% CI: 2.00,6.25; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Radiologists' personal income and knowledge of the federal advocacy process were identified as key factors influencing donations. PAC donation may benefit from raising awareness of the federal advocacy process, as well as from targeted fundraising strategies aimed at higher earners.
机译:目的:识别与放射科学捐赠与放射学政治行动委员会(PACS)相关的因素。材料和方法:通过电子邮件发送到4474个放射科学家的调查。调查的因素包括人口统计学,捐助者历史和联邦倡导过程的知识。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与捐赠者行为相关的因素。结果:总共336位放射科医师完成了调查。总体而言,152名(46.2%)的放射科医生报告过去一年捐赠给放射科PAC。年度个人收入的人> 450,000美元的赔率比年度个人收入捐赠更大赔率<450,000美元(赔率比率[或]:2.58,95%置信区间[CI]:147-4.52; P <0.001)。超过四分之三(77.2%,N = 254)报道了有限或无知的联邦宣传过程。对联邦宣传过程的良好或优秀知识的人比没有知识的人捐赠更大的赔率(或:2.63,95%CI:1.01-6.84; P = 0.047)。有意识的人认为,成员国和基金会没有资助介入放射学政治行动委员会的资金捐赠的可能性更大(或:3.54,95%CI:2.00,6.25; P <0.001)。结论:放射科医师的个人收入和对联邦宣传过程的知识被确定为影响捐赠的关键因素。 PAC捐赠可能会受益于提高联邦宣传过程的认识,以及针对更高人员的目标筹款策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号