...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in pulmonary medicine >Patient-reported outcomes in asthma clinical trials
【24h】

Patient-reported outcomes in asthma clinical trials

机译:患者报告的哮喘临床试验结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose of reviewThe review provides an overview of the results of asthma clinical trials published in peer review journals in the last 18 months that evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Recent findingsIn the last 10 years, health care moved toward a patient-centered approach, which includes patients' perspectives reflecting the impact of a disease and its treatment.SummarySurprisingly, among the almost 300 clinical trials published in the last one and a half year, PRO evaluation was performed in only 20 studies, and none of them held in a real-life setting. The effort of applying the scientific methods of PRO investigations in asthma clinical trials following a rigorous and systematic approach needs to be highly improved to allow better understanding of patient reported factors. Some recommendations are drawn particularly about PRO assessment in personalized medicine research. The ability of an individual PRO to evaluate choice of treatment and its effectiveness remains to be achieved.
机译:审查目的审查概述了在过去18个月的同行评审期刊中发表的哮喘临床试验结果概述,评估了患者报告的结果(专业人士).Tecent发现在过去10年中,保健朝着患者为中心的方法迁移包括反映患者的观点反映了疾病的影响及其治疗。ummarySurprisely,在过去一年半的近300次临床试验中,Pro评估只在20项研究中进行,并且他们都没有举行现实生活环境。在严格和系统的方法中应用哮喘临床试验中Pro调查的科学方法的努力需要得到高度改善,以便更好地理解患者报告的因素。特别是关于个性化医学研究中的PRO评估筹备了一些建议。个人专业人士评估治疗选择及其有效性的能力仍有待实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号