...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Geotechnica Slovenica >REINFORCED PILED EMBANKMENT FOR A HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY OVER SOFT SOIL: A NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION
【24h】

REINFORCED PILED EMBANKMENT FOR A HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY OVER SOFT SOIL: A NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION

机译:软土地基上高速铁路的加固桩路堤:数值和分析研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A geosynthetic, reinforced, piled embankment is an effective and economic method to solve the problems of possible bearing failure, unacceptable settlement and slope instability for an embankment built over soft soil; this has led to its widespread use, especially for high-speed railway embankments. Some design methods have been developed to assess the performance of these reinforced structures, which are mainly based on the results from small-scale models and numerical simulations. However, the reliability of these methods needs to be validated under full-scale field tests. This paper presents a numerical and analytical study for a full-scale field test of the Fengyang high-speed railway embankment. The results were analyzed and discussed in terms of the settlement of subsoil, the stress-concentration ratio (SCR), the axial force and the frictional stress of the pile. They showed that the settlement of the subsoil, from both the finite-element method (FEM) and the analytical method, were in good agreement with the measurement, and thus was a reliable parameter to assess the performance of the piled embankment with reasonable accuracy. The SCR was overestimated by the modified Terzaghi method, with a difference of 25%, while it was underestimated by the FEM, with a difference of approximately 20%. It was also shown that the tensile force in the reinforcement could be effectively assessed using the proposed analytical method, while it was overestimated by the FEM with a difference of 44%.
机译:土工合成的加筋的堆积式路堤是一种有效且经济的方法,可以解决软土地基上路堤可能的支座破坏,不可接受的沉降和边坡失稳的问题;这导致了它的广泛使用,尤其是在高速铁路路堤上。已经开发了一些评估这些增强结构性能的设计方法,这些方法主要基于小规模模型和数值模拟的结果。但是,这些方法的可靠性需要在全面的现场测试下进行验证。本文对凤阳高铁路堤进行了全面的现场试验数值分析。根据地基沉降,应力集中比(SCR),桩的轴向力和摩擦应力对结果进行了分析和讨论。他们表明,无论是有限元法还是分析法,地基下沉都与实测值吻合良好,因此是合理评估桩基路堤性能的可靠参数。 SCR被改进的Terzaghi方法高估,相差25%,而FEM低估了SCR,相差约20%。还表明,使用建议的分析方法可以有效地评估钢筋中的拉力,而有限元法高估了拉力,相差44%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号