...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Usefulness of real-time PCR for lytA, ply, and Spn9802 on plasma samples for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia.
【24h】

Usefulness of real-time PCR for lytA, ply, and Spn9802 on plasma samples for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia.

机译:Lyta,Ply和SPN9802对血浆样品的实时PCR的有用性,用于诊断肺炎球菌肺炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present study, we evaluated rapid real-time PCR assays for ply, Spn9802, and lytA applied to plasma samples for the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In a prospective study of CAP aetiology, an EDTA plasma sample was collected together with blood culture in 92 adult CAP patients and 91 adult controls. Among the 92 CAP patients, lytA PCR was positive in eight (9%), Spn9802 PCR was positive in 11 (12%) and ply PCR was positive in 19 (21%) cases. Of 91 controls, the ply PCR was positive in eight cases (9%), but no positive cases were noted by Spn9802 or lytA PCRs. Ten CAP patients had pneumococcal bacteraemia. Compared to blood culture, PCR for lytA, Spn9802 and ply had sensitivities of 70% (7/10), 60% (6/10) and 70% (7/10), and specificities of 96% (79/82), 94% (77/82) and 85% (70/82) respectively. With blood culture and/or culture of representative sputum, and/or urinary antigen detection, S. pneumoniae was identified in 31 CAP patients. Compared to these tests in combination, PCR for lytA, Spn9802 and ply showed sensitivities of 26% (8/31), 32% (10/31) and 42% (13/31), and specificities of 100% (61/61), 98% (60/61) and 90% (55/61) respectively. We conclude that Spn9802 and lytA PCRs may be useful for the rapid detection of bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia, whereas ply PCR is not specific enough for routine use and blood PCR with small plasma volumes is not useful for the detection of nonbacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia.
机译:在本研究中,我们评估了应用于血浆样品的Ply,SPN9802和Lyta的快速实时PCR测定,用于检测患有社区肺炎(帽)的患者中肺炎链球菌。在对帽期科的前瞻性研究中,在92例成人盖患者和91例成人对照中将EDTA血浆样品与血液培养一起收集。在92例患者中,Lyta PCR在8(9%)中为阳性,SPN9802 PCR为阳性11(12%),PCR在19(21%)阳性中为阳性。在91例中,PLY PCR在8例(9%)中为阳性,但SPN9802或LYTA PCR没有发现阳性病例。十个概念患者患有肺炎球菌菌血症。与血液培养相比,Lyta,SPN​​9802和PLY的PCR具有70%(7/10),60%(6/10)和70%(7/10)的敏感性,以及96%(79/82)的特异性, 94%(77/82)和85%(70/82)。患有血液培养和/或培养的代表性痰,和/或泌尿抗原检测,31例患者中鉴定了肺炎。与组合测试相比,LYTA的PCR,SPN9802和PLY显示出敏感性为26%(8/31),32%(10/31)和42%(13/31),比100%的特异性(61/61) )分别为98%(60/61)和90%(55/61)。我们得出结论,SPN9802和Lyta PCRs对于快速检测诱导诱导肺炎骨膜肺炎,而PLY PCR不足以足够足以进行常规使用,并且具有小血浆体积的血液PCR对于检测不适的肺炎球菌肺炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号