...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Fluids >A comparison of three kinds of local and parallel finite element algorithms based on two-grid discretizations for the stationary Navier-Stokes equations
【24h】

A comparison of three kinds of local and parallel finite element algorithms based on two-grid discretizations for the stationary Navier-Stokes equations

机译:基于静止Navier-Stokes方程的三种局部和并行有限元算法的三种局部和并行有限元算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on two-grid discretizations, three kinds of local and parallel finite element algorithms for the stationary Navier-Stokes equations are introduced and discussed. The main technique is first to use a standard finite element discretization on a coarse grid to approximate low frequencies of the solution, then to apply some linearized discretizations on a fine grid to correct the resulted residual (which contains mostly high frequencies) by some local and parallel procedures. Three approaches to linearization are discussed. Under the uniqueness condition, error estimates of the finite element solution are derived. Numerical results show that among the three kinds of parallel algorithms, the Oseen-linearized algorithm is preferable if we both consider the computational time and the accuracy of the approximate solution.
机译:基于双电网离散化,介绍并讨论了静止Navier-Stokes方程的三种本地和并行有限元算法。 首先是在粗网格上使用标准有限元离散化来近似频率的溶液,然后在细网格上应用一些线性化离散化,以纠正一些本地和 并行程序。 讨论了三种线性化方法。 在唯一性条件下,导出有限元解决方案的错误估计。 数值结果表明,在三种并行算法中,如果我们都考虑计算时间和近似解决方案的准确性,则优选解释线性化算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号