...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical drug investigation >Changes in Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs After Introduction of Polypharmacy Reduction Policy in Japan Based on a Large-Scale Claims Database
【24h】

Changes in Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs After Introduction of Polypharmacy Reduction Policy in Japan Based on a Large-Scale Claims Database

机译:基于大规模索赔数据库在日本引入多酚疾病减少政策后,精神药物处方的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Objectives In Japan, polypharmacy reduction policy, which reduces the reimbursement of medical cost, was introduced to address unnecessary psychotropic polypharmacy. The rule was applied to the prescriptions of three or more anxiolytics or three or more hypnotics in the policy introduced in 2012. The prescriptions of four or more antidepressants or four or more antipsychotics were added to the rule in the policy revised in 2014. Furthermore, the prescriptions of three or more drugs of anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, or antipsychotics were subject to the reduction criteria of the policy revision in 2016. Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZs) are classified both into anxiolytics and hypnotics, and the reduction rule was not applied to the category of BZs before April 2018. This study aimed to examine the effect of the policy on the prescriptions of four drug categories as well as BZs from the point of view of the number of drugs and doses. Methods This was a retrospective observational study using a large-scale Japanese health insurance claims database. Patients who were prescribed at least one psychotropic drug (anxiolytic, hypnotic, antidepressant, or antipsychotic) during the study period (from April 2011 to March 2017) were selected. Segmented regression analysis was used to analyze the proportions of patients with three or more or four or more drugs as well as patients above clinically recommended doses, and the means of the average daily doses by drug category. Results A total of 312,167 patients were identified as a study population. The proportions of patients with three or more drugs in anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics significantly decreased after the introduction or revisions of the policy, but not BZs. The proportions of patients with three or more drugs in March 2017 were 0.9%, 2.0%, 1.2%, 2.4%, and 8.9% in anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and BZs, respectively. The effect of the policy in reducing the proportions of patients above clinically recommended doses was identified in antipsychotics after the revision in 2016, but not identified in the sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics as well as BZs after the revision in 2014, and antidepressants after the revision in 2016. The proportions of monotherapy were increased from April 2011 to March 2017 only for antidepressants (76.9% -> 80.8%) and antipsychotics (79.8% -> 82.1%), and not changed or decreased for anxiolytics (85.2% -> 85.7%), hypnotics (78.6% -> 77.6%), sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics (68.1% -> 65.7%), BZs (68.0% -> 67.3%), and sum of psychotropic drugs (52.1% -> 49.9%). Conclusions The polypharmacy reduction policy reduced the proportions of patients with three or more drugs in four drug categories, but not BZs. Only limited effects were seen for reducing the proportions of patients above clinically recommended doses. The policy was revised in April 2018 again. Further investigation is needed to examine the effect of the revision in 2018.
机译:介绍了日本的背景和目标,减少了减少医疗费用报销的复数减少政策,以解决不必要的精神心理复合性。该规则适用于2012年引入的政策中的三种或更多种抗焦虑或三种或更多次催眠术的处方。在2014年修订的政策中的规则中向该规则中加入了四种或更多种抗抑郁药的处方。此外,三种或更多种窒息性,催眠,抗抑郁药或抗精神病药药物的处方受到2016年政策修订的减少标准。苯二氮卓受体激动剂(BZS)分为抗焦虑和催眠药,并且还没有申请减少规则到2018年4月之前的BZS类别。本研究旨在从药物和剂量的数量的角度来研究政策对四种药物类别的处方以及BZS的效果。方法这是使用大规模日本健康保险索赔数据库的回顾性观察研究。在研究期间(2011年4月到2017年4月至2017年4月起),在研究期间至少进行了至少一种精神药物(疾病,催眠,抗抑郁药或抗精神病药)的患者。分段回归分析用于分析三种以上或四种或更多种药物以及临床推荐剂量高于患者的患者的比例,以及通过药物类别的平均每日剂量的手段。结果共有312,167名患者被鉴定为研究人群。在政策的引入或修订之后,患有三种或更多种药物,催眠,抗抑郁药和抗血松药物的患者的比例显着降低,但不是BZS。 2017年3月3日或更多药物的比例分别为抗焦虑,催眠,抗抑郁药,抗精神病药和BZS的3月或更多次药物的比例为0.9%,2.0%,1.2%,2.4%和8.9%。在2016年修订后,在抗精神病药中鉴定了对临床推荐剂量的比例减少临床推荐剂量的比例的影响,但在2014年修订后的抗焦虑和催眠药和催眠药之和中没有识别,并在修订后抗抑郁药2016年。单药治疗的比例从2011年4月到2017年3月仅增加抗抑郁药(76.9% - > 80.8%)和抗精神病药(79.8% - > 82.1%),而不改变或减少抗焦虑(85.2% - > 85.7) %),催眠药(78.6% - > 77.6%),抗焦虑和催眠药和(68.1% - > 65.7%),BZS(68.0% - > 67.3%)和精神药物的总和(52.1% - > 49.9%) 。结论复数减少政策在四种药物类别中减少了三种或更多种药物的比例,但不是BZS。只有有限的效果可以降低临床推荐剂量高于患者的比例。该政策再次于2018年4月修订。需要进一步调查来审查2018年修订的效果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Clinical drug investigation》 |2019年第11期|共16页
  • 作者

    Hirano Yoko; Ii Yoichi;

  • 作者单位

    Kitasato Univ Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci Dept Clin Med Pharmaceut Med Minato Ku 5-9-1 Shirokane;

    Pfizer R&

    D Japan GK Biometr &

    Data Management Shibuya Ku Tokyo Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号