首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Senses >Human Fear Chemosignaling: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Human Fear Chemosignaling: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

机译:人类恐惧化学信号:来自Meta分析的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Alarm pheromones are widely used in the animal kingdom. Notably, there are 26 published studies (N = 1652) highlighting a human capacity to communicate fear, stress, and anxiety via body odor from one person (66% males) to another (69% females). The question is whether the findings of this literature reflect a true effect, and what the average effect size is. These questions were answered by combining traditional meta-analysis with novel meta-analytical tools, p-curve analysis and p-uniform-techniques that could indicate whether findings are likely to reflect a true effect based on the distribution of P-values. A traditional random-effects meta-analysis yielded a small-to-moderate effect size (Hedges' g: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.31-0.41), p-curve analysis showed evidence diagnostic of a true effect (ps < 0.0001), and there was no evidence for publication bias. This meta-analysis did not assess the internal validity of the current studies; yet, the combined results illustrate the statistical robustness of a field in human olfaction dealing with the human capacity to communicate certain emotions (fear, stress, anxiety) via body odor.
机译:报警信息素广泛应用于动物王国。值得注意的是,有26个公布的研究(n = 1652)突出了人类能力,通过从一个人(66%的男性)到另一个人(66%的女性)的身体气味来传达恐惧,压力和焦虑的能力。问题是该文献的结果是否反映了真实效果,以及平均效果大小是多少。通过将传统的Meta分析与新的Meta分析工具,P曲线分析和对均匀技术相结合来回答这些问题,这些技术可以指示结果是否可能基于P值的分布反映真实效果。传统的随机效应元分析产生了小于中等的效果大小(HEDGES的G:0.36,95%CI:0.31-0.41),P曲线分析显示证据诊断真实效果(PS <0.0001),并且没有证据表明偏见。该荟萃分析没有评估目前研究的内部有效性;然而,组合结果说明了人类嗅觉中的统计稳健性,处理人类能力,通过身体气味传达某些情绪(恐惧,压力,焦虑)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号