首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Senses >Quantification of Oral Roughness Perception and Comparison with Mechanism of Astringency Perception
【24h】

Quantification of Oral Roughness Perception and Comparison with Mechanism of Astringency Perception

机译:口腔粗糙度感知的量化与涩味机制比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Texture contributes to food acceptance, but oral texture perception is incompletely understood. Presently, we quantified individual sensitivities to lingual tactile roughness and assessed the impact of age, salivary flow (SF), and fungiform papillae density (FPD) on threshold and suprathreshold perception. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that individuals highly sensitive to tactile roughness exhibit sensitivity to astringent stimuli. Detection thresholds (DTs) were determined using the staircase method for surface roughness from stainless steel coupons (Ra; 0.177-0.465 mu m) and astringency elicited by epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG; 0-1.64 mM) and tannic acid (TA; 0-0.71 mM) from 30 individuals. Suprathreshold sensitivity was assessed from intensity ratings of electroforming comparator surfaces with roughnesses ranging from 0.51 to 22.8 ae m and astringent stimuli ranging from 0 to 5.2 mM (EGCG) and from 0 to 1.9 mM (TA). SF, FPD, and astringent food pleasantness scores were collected. Variability in threshold roughness sensitivity enabled dividing subjects into high (RHi; n = 16) and low (RLo; n = 14) sensitivity groups; however, no significant differences in age, FPD, or SF were observed across these cohorts. Interestingly, compared with RLo, the RHi group exhibited greater sensitivity to EGCG but not TA astringency and indicated greater pleasantness from astringent foods (e.g., unripe bananas and dark chocolate). When participants were allocated into high (SalivaHi; n = 15) or low SF (SalivaLo; n = 15) groups, TA-evoked astringency thresholds were significantly lower in SalivaHi whom also indicated greater pleasantness from astringent red wines. For suprathreshold assessments of surface roughness or astringency, no significant associations were identified with age, FPD, or SF. Suprathreshold roughness sensitivity was, however, associated with suprathreshold sensitivity to EGCG but not TA astringency.
机译:质地有助于食物验收,但口腔纹理感知是不完全理解的。目前,我们量化了单个敏感性对舌触觉粗糙度,并评估年龄,唾液流动(SF)和真菌乳头密度(FPD)对阈值和Suprathreshold感知的影响。此外,我们测试了对触觉粗糙度高度敏感的个体对涩刺激的敏感性的假设。使用来自不锈钢优惠券(RA; 0.177-0.465 mu m)的表面粗糙度(Ra; 0.177-0.465 mu m)和由epigallocatechin gallate(egcg; 0-1.64mm)和单宁酸(ta; 0-0.71而引发的涩味方法测定检测阈值mm)来自30个人。从电铸比较器表面的强度额定值评估Suprathreshold敏感性,粗糙度范围为0.51至22.8 AE m,并且涩味刺激范围为0至5.2mm(egcg)和0至1.9mm(ta)。收集SF,FPD和收敛食物愉快评分。阈值粗糙度灵敏度的可变性使将受试者分成高(RHI; n = 16)和低(RLO; n = 14)敏感性组;然而,在这些队列中没有观察到年龄,FPD或SF的显着差异。有趣的是,与RLO相比,RHI组对EGCG表现出更敏感,但不是TA涩味,并表明从涩味食物(例如,未成熟的香蕉和黑巧克力)更令人愉悦。当参与者分配到高(Salivahi; N = 15)或低SF(Salivalo; N = 15)组时,唾液中的TA诱发的收缩阈值显着降低,唾液中也表明涩红葡萄酒的更大愉快。对于表面粗糙度或涩味的Suprathreshold评估,没有以年龄,FPD或SF鉴定重大关联。然而,Suprathreshold粗糙度灵敏度与Suprathreshold敏感性与EGCG但不是TA涩味相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号