首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions >Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Patients with Dialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Patients with Dialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:透析患者的跨膜导管主动脉瓣膜置换和外科主动脉瓣置换结果:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Dialysis is associated with higher rate of aortic valve calcification and higher cardiovascular mortality. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with higher and intermediate co-morbidities including dialysis. Methods: Two independent investigators systematically searched Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The ROBINS-I tool was used to analyze and assess the bias from the selected studies. Results: The search resulted in 4 observational studies with a total of 966 patients. TAVR in dialysis patients was associated with no significant difference in in-hospital mortality [8.1% vs 10.3%; OR (95% CI) 0.74 (0.35,1.60), 12 = 50%, P = 0.45], risk-of-strokes at 30 days [2% vs 4.4%; OR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.22,1.09), 12 = 0%, P = 0.08], vascular complications [12.7% vs 13.2%; OR (95% CI) 0.96 (0.55,1.67), 12 = 0%, P = 0.89], need of blood transfusion [43.1% vs 66.4%; OR (95% CI) 0.27 (0.05,1.39), 12 = 89%, P = 0.12], or bleeding risk [5.6% vs 6.8%; OR (95% CI) 0.91 (0.18, 4.64), 12 = 5%, P = 0.91 ] when compared to SAVR. TAVR was associated with significantly shorter length of stay [8.5 days vs 14.2 days; mean difference (95% CI) -5.89 (-9.13, -2.64), 12 = 76%, P < 0.0001 ] and higher pacemaker implantation [11.4% vs 6.8%; OR (95% CI) 1.74 (1.07,2.81), 12 = 5%, P = 0.02]. Conclusion: TAVR outcomes were comparable to SAVR but had a significantly shorter length of stay and a higher pacemaker implantation rate in dialysis patients.
机译:背景:透析与主动脉瓣钙化率较高,心血管死亡率较高。经膜管主动脉瓣置换(TAVR)是具有透析等高级和中间的患者的手术主动脉瓣置换(SAVR)的既定替代方案。方法:两位独立调查人员系统地搜查了Medline,Cochrane和科学网络。 Robins-I工具用于分析和评估所选研究的偏差。结果:搜索导致4项观测研究,共有966名患者。透析患者的TAVR与医院内死亡率无显着差异有关[8.1%vs 10.3%;或(95%CI)0.74(0.35,1.60),12 = 50%,p = 0.45],30天风险急剧[2%Vs 4.4%;或(95%CI)0.49(0.22,1.09),12 = 0%,P = 0.08],血管并发症[12.7%Vs 13.2%;或(95%CI)0.96(0.55,1.67),12 = 0%,p = 0.89],需要输血[43.1%Vs 66.4%;或(95%CI)0.27(0.05,1.39),12 = 89%,P = 0.12]或出血风险[5.6%vs 6.8%;与SAVR相比,或(95%CI)0.91(0.18,4.64),12 = 5%,p = 0.91]。 TAVR与逗留时间明显较短[8.5天与14.2天;平均差异(95%CI)-5.89(-9.13,-2.64),12 = 76%,P <0.0001]和更高的起搏器植入[11.4%Vs 6.8%;或(95%CI)1.74(1.07,2.81),12 = 5%,P = 0.02]。结论:TAVR结果与SAVR相当,但在透析患者中​​具有显着较短的住宿及更高的起搏器植入率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号