...
【24h】

Prevalence of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis: A systematic review

机译:单克隆B细胞淋巴细胞增多症的流行:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Individuals with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) have been identified in clinic outpatients, in unaffected relatives of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and in general populations. MBL and its relationship with CLL have been actively investigated over the last decade. This report systematically reviews the prevalence of MBL in the context of the populations studied and the evolution of laboratory methods used to define MBL. Methods: To identify published studies that have assessed the prevalence of MBL, we systematically searched the MEDLINE? databases and consulted with members of the International MBL Study Group. We reviewed the 10 articles that were identified by this process. We abstracted information on study populations, laboratory tests, criteria for designating MBL, and the reported frequencies. Results: Three of the ten studies were published in 2009, three between 2007 and 2008, and four between 2002 and 2004. Reported prevalences varied widely, ranging from 0.12 to 18.2%. This variability was clearly associated with both the laboratory methods and the populations studied. MBL was more common among older individuals and kindred of persons with CLL. The most common MBL subtype was CLL-like MBL. Conclusions: Large population-based studies of MBL that employ standardized laboratory methods with a consensus case definition are needed to assess prevalence and establish risk factors. These studies should include prospective follow-up of MBL cases to determine the relationship between MBL and CLL. Data from original studies should be reported in sufficient detail to allow future synthesis of information from multiple studies, such as meta-analysis.
机译:背景:已经在临床门诊患者,慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的未受影响亲属和普通人群中鉴定出患有单克隆B细胞淋巴细胞增多症(MBL)的个体。在过去的十年中,已经积极地研究了MBL及其与CLL的关系。本报告系统地回顾了在研究人群中MBL的患病率以及用于定义MBL的实验室方法的演变。方法:为了确定已发表的评估MBL患病率的研究,我们系统地搜索了MEDLINE?数据库,并与国际MBL研究小组的成员进行了协商。我们回顾了此过程确定的10篇文章。我们提取了有关研究人群,实验室测试,MBL指定标准和报告频率的信息。结果:十项研究中的三项于2009年发表,三项在2007年至2008年之间发表,四项在2002年至2004年之间发表。报告的患病率差异很大,范围为0.12%至18.2%。这种变异性显然与实验室方法和研究人群有关。 MBL在老年人和CLL患者中更为普遍。最常见的MBL亚型是CLL样MBL。结论:需要采用基于实验室的标准方法和共识病例定义的基于MBL的大型人群研究来评估患病率并确定危险因素。这些研究应包括MBL病例的前瞻性随访,以确定MBL与CLL之间的关系。应充分详细报告原始研究的数据,以便将来综合来自多种研究的信息,例如荟萃分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号