...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >Vocabulary skills of school-age children with acquired brain injury: an exploration of tiered word knowledge and naming errors
【24h】

Vocabulary skills of school-age children with acquired brain injury: an exploration of tiered word knowledge and naming errors

机译:获得脑损伤学龄儿童的词汇技巧:对分层知识和命名误差的探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Vocabulary deficits are the most frequently documented communication difficulty following childhood acquired brain injury (ABI). Given the adverse consequences of limited vocabulary on academic success, it is critical to identify the presence and nature of vocabulary impairments to provide effective intervention for children with ABI. Method: Eleven children (7;6-11;11) with moderate/severe ABI (>12 months post-injury) and individually matched typically developing (TD) controls completed an Australian adaptation of a vocabulary assessment based on a three-tiered framework: tier 1 (basic words), tier 2 (high-frequency, cross-curricular words), and tier 3 (curriculum-based words). Overall scores and tiered accuracy were compared at individual and group level. Type and frequency of expressive naming errors were also coded. Results: In this pilot study, children with ABI demonstrated poorer overall scores than TD children. Equivalent accuracy was noted for tier 1 words and tier 2 receptive words. However, significantly poorer accuracy was noted in the ABI group for tier 2 expressive words and all tier 3 words. The majority of naming errors were semantic across both groups although TD participants showed a wider distribution of error types. Conclusions: Findings support the use of tier 2 and 3 vocabulary as intervention targets in this population within education contexts and speech pathology settings.
机译:背景:词汇赤字是儿童时期获得脑损伤(ABI)之后最常见的沟通难度。鉴于有限词汇对学术成功的不利后果,识别词汇障碍的存在和性质至关重要,为ABI提供有效的儿童干预。方法:11名儿童(7; 6-11; 11),中度/严重的ABI(>损伤后12个月)和单独匹配的典型发展(TD)控制完成了基于三层框架的词汇评估的澳大利亚改编:第1层(基本单词),第2层(高频,跨课程单词)和第3层(基于课程的单词)。在个体和群体水平比较总分数和分层准确性。还编码了表达命名误差的类型和频率。结果:在这项试点研究中,与ABI的儿童表现出较贫穷的整体分数,而不是TD儿童。第1单词和第2层接收单词指出了等效的准确性。然而,在ABI组中,对于第2层表达词语和所有三级单词,在ABI组中指出了显着较差的准确性。尽管TD参与者显示出更广泛的误差类型分发,但大多数命名错误都是语义。结论:调查结果支持在教育背景和语音病理环境中使用Tier 2和3个词汇表作为本人的干预目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号