...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ quality & safety >Addressing the challenges of knowledge co-production in quality improvement: learning from the implementation of the researcher-in-residence model
【24h】

Addressing the challenges of knowledge co-production in quality improvement: learning from the implementation of the researcher-in-residence model

机译:解决知识合作质量改进的挑战:从实施研究员 - 居住模式的实施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of knowledge co-production is used in health services research to describe partnerships (which can involve researchers, practitioners, managers, commissioners or service users) with the purpose of creating, sharing and negotiating different knowledge types used to make improvements in health services. Several knowledge co-production models have been proposed to date, some involving intermediary roles. This paper explores one such model, researchers-in-residence (also known as 'embedded researchers'). In this model, researchers work inside healthcare organisations, operating as staff members while also maintaining an affiliation with academic institutions. As part of the local team, researchers negotiate the meaning and use of research-based knowledge to co-produce knowledge, which is sensitive to the local context. Even though this model is spreading and appears to have potential for using co-produced knowledge to make changes in practice, a number of challenges with its use are emerging. These include challenges experienced by the researchers in embedding themselves within the practice environment, preserving a clear focus within their host organisations and maintaining academic professional identity. In this paper, we provide an exploration of these challenges by examining three independent case studies implemented in the UK, each of which attempted to co-produce relevant research projects to improve the quality of care. We explore how these played out in practice and the strategies used by the researchers-in-residence to address them. In describing and analysing these strategies, we hope that participatory approaches to knowledge co-production can be used more effectively in the future.
机译:知识共同生产的概念用于卫生服务研究,以描述伙伴关系(可能涉及研究人员,从业者,经理,专员或服务用户),以创建,分享和谈判用于改进卫生服务的不同知识类型。迄今为止已经提出了一些知识共同生产模型,其中一些涉及中间角色。本文探讨了一个这样的模型,研究人员 - 住宅(也称为“嵌入式研究人员”)。在这个模式中,研究人员在医疗保健组织内部工作,作为工作人员经营,同时也保持与学术机构的隶属关系。作为当地团队的一部分,研究人员协商基于研究的知识的意义和使用,共同产生知识,这对本地背景敏感。即使这种模型正在蔓延,似乎有可能使用共同产生的知识在实践中做出变化,但它的使用是出现的许多挑战。这些包括研究人员在营造环境中嵌入自己的挑战,在他们的主办组织内保持明确的关注并保持学术专业身份。在本文中,我们通过审查英国实施的三项独立案例研究,为这些挑战进行了探索,每项案例研究都试图共同生产相关的研究项目以提高护理质量。我们探讨这些在实践中的出现和研究人员使用的策略如何解决这些问题。在描述和分析这些策略时,我们希望未来可以更有效地使用知识共同生产的参与式途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号