首页> 外文期刊>Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, Section C. Food Economics >Schemes for aggregating preferential tariffs in agriculture, export volume effects, and African LDCs.
【24h】

Schemes for aggregating preferential tariffs in agriculture, export volume effects, and African LDCs.

机译:汇总农业,出口量效应和非洲最不发达国家的特惠关税的计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Import-weighted aggregated tariffs are often used in analyzing issues of erosion of non-reciprocal preferences. This paper argues that commonly used import-weighted tariffs under-estimate the true level of protection on imports originated from preference-receiving countries, especially the African least developed countries (LDC)s (ALDCs). The theoretical discussion of this paper suggests that when used in numerical simulations of preference erosion and expansion scenarios, import-weighted tariffs tend to incorrectly downplay the preference erosion effect of most favoured nation's tariff cuts, and understate the export promotion effect of expanding preferences. As an alternative to the import-weight method, a simple average method is used to calculate aggregated tariffs imposed on ALDCs. These are shown to be indeed higher than their import-weighted counterparts aggregated from the same disaggregated source. Numerical simulations conducted with the two sets of aggregated tariffs confirm the theoretical discussion and suggest that the issues of preference erosion and preference expansion should be taken more seriously than what has been suggested by studies relied on import-weighted aggregated tariffs.
机译:进口加权总关税通常用于分析非互惠优惠的侵蚀问题。本文认为,常用的进口加权关税低估了来自接受优惠的国家,特别是非洲最不发达国家(LDC)的进口产品的真正保护水平。本文的理论讨论表明,在用于优先权侵蚀和扩张情景的数值模拟中,进口加权关税往往会错误地低估最惠国减税的优先权侵蚀效应,并低估了扩大优惠的出口促进效应。作为导入加权方法的替代方法,可以使用简单的平均方法来计算对低收入发展中国家征收的汇总关税。事实证明,这些数字确实高于从同一分类来源汇总的进口加权同行。用两组总关税进行的数值模拟证实了理论上的讨论,并表明,与依赖进口加权总关税的研究所提出的建议相比,应更认真地对待优惠侵蚀和优惠扩展问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号