...
首页> 外文期刊>ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage >Machine Learning Based Typology Development in Archaeology
【24h】

Machine Learning Based Typology Development in Archaeology

机译:基于机器学习的考古学类型学发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Formalizing and objectifying the process of artefact classification is an old wish of many archaeologists. On the other hand, data mining in general and machine learning in particular have already inspired many disciplines to introduce new paradigms of data analysis and knowledge discovery. Hence, this article aims for reviving the Typological Debate by adapting approved methods from other fields of science to archaeological data. To this end, we extensively discuss the concept of similarity and assess the suitability of machine learning techniques for the purposes of classification and typology development. Our methodology covers all steps starting from unordered, unlabelled objects to the emergence of a consistent and reusable typology. The application of this process is exemplarily illustrated by classifying the vessels from a Late Bronze Age cemetery in Eastern Saxony. Despite the individual character of these vessels, we achieved class prediction rates of more than 95%. Such a success was only possible, because we permanently reconciled the output of the learning algorithms with our own expectations in order to identify and eliminate the systematic errors within the typology.
机译:正式和客观化人工制品分类的过程是许多考古学家的古老愿望。另一方面,一般而言,数据挖掘尤其是机器学习已经启发了许多学科,引入了数据分析和知识发现的新范例。因此,本文旨在通过将其他科学领域的认可方法改编为考古数据,来复兴类型学辩论。为此,我们广泛讨论了相似性的概念,并评估了机器学习技术是否适用于分类和类型学开发。我们的方法论涵盖了从无序,未标记的对象到一致且可重用的类型学出现的所有步骤。通过对东部萨克森州晚期青铜时代公墓的船只进行分类来举例说明该方法的应用。尽管这些船只具有独特性,但我们仍达到了95%以上的舱位预测率。这样的成功仅是可能的,因为我们将学习算法的输出与自己的期望永久保持一致,以便识别并消除类型学内的系统错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号