首页> 外文期刊>COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Efficacy and Safety of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) Versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Chinese Cohort from the LANTERN Study
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) Versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Chinese Cohort from the LANTERN Study

机译:茚达特罗/格隆铵(IND / GLY)与沙美特罗/氟替卡松在中国中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:来自LANTERN研究的中国人群

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inhaled indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination (IND/GLY) is approved in over 80 countries, including the EU, Japan, Australia and Switzerland and the US. The LANTERN study evaluated the efficacy of IND/GLY compared with inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD with a history of <= 1 exacerbation in the previous year. Here we present the efficacy and safety of IND/GLY versus SFC in the Chinese cohort from the LANTERN study. LANTERN was a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD with a history of <= 1 exacerbation in the previous year. The patients were randomized (1:1) to once-daily IND/GLY (110/50 mu g) or twice-daily SFC (50/500 mu g). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of IND/GLY versus SFC in terms of trough FEV1. Of the total 744 patients randomized in the LANTERN study, 598 (80.4%) were from Mainland China and randomized to IND/GLY (n = 298) or SFC (n = 300), and 553 (92.5%) completed the study. IND/GLY showed superiority over SFC with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in trough FEV1, FEV1 AUC(0-4h), peak FEV1 and trough forced vital capacity (FVC) change from the baseline. Annualized rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations was significantly lower (43%) with IND/GLY compared with SFC (rate ratio: 0.57, p = 0.015). Overall, adverse events were lower for IND/GLY (34.6%) versus SFC (43.1%). IND/GLY was superior in achieving bronchodilation versus SFC in a Chinese subgroup of patients from this study.
机译:吸入茚达特罗/格隆铵固定剂量组合(IND / GLY)已在80多个国家/地区获得批准,其中包括欧盟,日本,澳大利亚和瑞士以及美国。 LANTERN研究评估了IND / GLY与吸入长效β(2)-激动剂(LABA)/吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)或沙美特罗/氟替卡松(SFC)相比在中重度COPD患者中的疗效上一年<= 1的恶化。在这里,我们从LANTERN研究中介绍了IND / GLY与SFC在中国队列中的疗效和安全性。 LANTERN是一项为期26周,多中心,随机,双盲,双虚拟,平行组的研究,研究对象为前一年病情加重≤1的中重度COPD患者。患者被随机分配(1:1)至每日一次IND / GLY(110/50微克)或每日两次SFC(50/500微克)。主要终点是就谷底FEV1而言,IND / GLY相对于SFC的非劣效性。在LANTERN研究中随机分配的744位患者中,有598位(80.4%)来自中国大陆,并随机分配到IND / GLY(n = 298)或SFC(n = 300),其中553位(92.5%)完成了研究。 IND / GLY显示出优于SFC的优势,谷底FEV1,FEV1 AUC(0-4h),峰值FEV1和谷底强制肺活量(FVC)与基线相比有统计学显着和临床意义的改善。与SFC相比,IND / GLY的中度或重度COPD加重的年率显着降低(43%)(比率:0.57,p = 0.015)。总体而言,IND / GLY(34.6%)低于SFC(43.1%)的不良事件。在这项研究的中国亚组患者中,IND / GLY在实现支气管扩张方面优于SFC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号