...
首页> 外文期刊>Biosecurity and bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science >Strategic dilemmas of biosecurity in the European union.
【24h】

Strategic dilemmas of biosecurity in the European union.

机译:欧盟生物安全的战略困境。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Systems for societal/homeland security in both Europe and the United States are in flux to adjust to 21st century threats, such as terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, regional conflicts, state failures, and organized crime. It is important that reforms take place on both sides of the Atlantic that recognize the interdependence of Europe and the United States. Security, including biosecurity, for Europe is strongly connected to security in the U.S. Diseases transcend borders, and their consequences can be the same, irrespective of where the outbreak occurs or whether it is a natural occurrence or an act of bioterrorism. This article examines the political and strategic dilemmas and complexities that would confront the European Union (EU) in the event of a bioterrorism attack or a naturally occurring outbreak. Although several initiatives have been taken by the 15 member states and within the EU Commission, the EU is not institutionally prepared for transnational, rapidly moving diseases that could cause grave consequences in Europe and other regions, including the U.S. The prime responsibility for protecting European citizens against outbreaks rests with each member state. However, with intertwined and open European societies, the consequences would likely spill across borders. The EU Commission would have to become involved because such aspects as the internal market and freedom of movement would be affected. Responsibility, but not authority, would be pushed to the top. A coordinated EU response to such crises depends on European political leadership.
机译:欧美的社会/国土安全系统都在不断变化,以适应21世纪的威胁,例如恐怖主义,大规模杀伤性武器的扩散,区域冲突,国家失败和有组织犯罪。必须在大西洋两岸进行承认欧洲和美国相互依存的改革,这一点很重要。欧洲的安全性(包括生物安全性)与美国疾病的安全性紧密联系在一起,跨越了疾病的边界,无论爆发发生在何处,是自然事件还是生物恐怖主义行为,其后果都可以相同。本文探讨了在发生生物恐怖主义袭击或自然爆发时欧盟面临的政治和战略困境与复杂性。尽管15个成员国和欧盟委员会已采取了多项举措,但欧盟并未为应对可能在欧洲和其他地区(包括美国)造成严重后果的跨国,快速传播的疾病做好机构准备。防止爆发取决于每个成员国。但是,在欧洲社会相互交织和开放的情况下,后果可能会跨越国界。欧盟委员会必须介入,因为内部市场和迁徙自由等方面都会受到影响。责任而非权威将被推到最高位置。欧盟对此类危机的协调反应取决于欧洲的政治领导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号